cemdervis

5 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by cemdervis 2mo ago

   pimpl also helps to keep data structure layout stable, e.g. Qt's d-pointer convention
2. 2.▲
   by cemdervis 3mo ago

   For transparency: That was the previous title of the page. I since changed many things on that site and reworded some fluff. Cheers.
3. 3.▲
   The case for physical media ownership(dervis.de)

   496 points by cemdervis 3mo ago|373 comments
4. 4.▲
   by cemdervis 6mo ago

   I am not aware of such a thing. Is GitHub itself requesting that when you create a PR, or is it because of the site's editor?
5. 5.▲
   by cemdervis 6mo ago

   GCC and MSVC are pretty close. fyi, the tables on cppreference are rather outdated at this point. I made a more up-to-date, community-maintained site: https://cppstat.dev/?conformance=cpp20
6. 6.▲
   by cemdervis 10mo ago

   Glad I could help!
7. 7.▲
   by cemdervis 10mo ago

   https://cppstat.dev
8. 8.▲
   by cemdervis 1y ago

   Reminds of something I read somewhere: "I don't love Java, but I love the house it bought me."
9. 9.▲
   by cemdervis 1y ago

   Hi, the live search is for developers that want to quickly look up the support for a particular feature. The "missing features" feature and filtering by compiler versions is something I'm currently working on. Any suggestions
10. 10.▲
    by cemdervis 1y ago

    Hi, I first designed this site as a way for C++ developers to quickly look up support for particular features (as you've described, in isolation). But in the long run, I think we can extract much more meaning out of these numbers, whic
11. 11.▲
    by cemdervis 1y ago

    Hi, thanks. I agree, modules support is kind of there, but not really. I think we could only go by what the compiler vendors state, and add some notes about what's missing.
12. 12.▲
    by cemdervis 1y ago

    Hi, I got the initial information from the cppreference compiler support site, then verified with each compiler vendors support tables and updated the information accordingly. Then I wrote a bot that watches all known (and most importantly,
13. 13.▲
    by cemdervis 1y ago

    Thank you very much, I also plan to add more information to the information section of each feature, so that people have the option to TL;DR instead of heading over to the proposals.
14. 14.▲
    by cemdervis 1y ago

    Hi, yes, it's just because I'm still trying out some design ideas and am polishing the code. I'm already in the process of open-sourcing it, so that everyone can contribute via GitHub PRs, it's just preparation work that
15. 15.▲
    by cemdervis 1y ago

    Thanks! I agree to an extent, but it's also the beast the industry married. So as long as it's around, we might as well "deal with it". This page is hopefully one tool that helps with that :)
16. 16.▲
    by cemdervis 1y ago

    Hi! That's certainly possible, and also what I'm already doing. However, it's very time-consuming to do it for every single feature. The compiler vendors already provide their feature-support tables for most features, which I
17. 17.▲
    Show HN: C++ Compiler Support Page(cppstat.dev)

    68 points by cemdervis 1y ago|30 comments
18. 18.▲
    by cemdervis 2y ago

    CMake + Ninja?
19. 19.▲
    by cemdervis 2y ago

    Fingers crossed
20. 20.▲
    by cemdervis 2y ago

    Swift
21. 21.▲
    by cemdervis 2y ago

    The "new" language you're describing sounds like Swift.