cb5r

12 ms·

1.
by cb5r 1y ago
I advise checking out the users other comments before jumping to conclusions. Doesn't look AI generated to me, rather just an "individual" writing style. Only because it's possible doesn't mean its true. Maybe user
2.
by cb5r 2y ago
Very interesting feature! Can anyone think of a real world use case for this?
3.
by cb5r 3y ago
In almost every case imaginable it is wrong to "eating them". Eating them implies taking their life against their will. Please supply one single reason why this is not wrong:
4.
by cb5r 3y ago
Oh, I didn't see it got flagged... Breaks my heart every time to see this happen when someone gives a voice to the voiceless. Then again, I would have disagreed with myself only 3 years ago, before I took some time to inform myself abo
5.
by cb5r 3y ago
My world view would be classified as "ethical", because I take the feelings and desires of others into account and don't put myself before them - which you, on the other hand, don't. And this is the exact same reason why
6.
by cb5r 3y ago
What makes you think that fish are in ANY way different than land animals or even humans? Why should they not suffer from being captured and not being able to live freely in their natural habitat? In what way is my POV biased? What you desc
7.
by cb5r 3y ago
Slaughtering animals for food is indeed a much bigger problem and probably one of largest issues we currently have - ranging over ethical issues, environmental issues, health issues and socioeconomic issues. However, this does not mean that
8.
by cb5r 3y ago
^ THIS is a must see. Not all zoos in the world combined will educate you like this 90 minute video does.
9.
by cb5r 3y ago
There are absolutely no positive benefits for people and especially children to visit zoos. Quite the opposite is the case: By visiting zoos, children get taught at a very early age that it is OK to capture animals and use them against thei
10.
by cb5r 3y ago
Is this your personal opinion or the sad acknowledgement of humanity's negative impact on all non-human animals on this planet?
11.
by cb5r 3y ago
Do you have any study or something supporting your claim that this/such a zoo's benefits outweigh the cons? I am well aware of its worth avoiding harming animals. This includes capturing them, holding them against their will, usin
12.
by cb5r 3y ago
One can be ignorant in different aspects. In various situations, one walks around with blinders on. One "only sees what one wants to see", because the brain filters out everything else that does not match ones world view - which i
13.
by cb5r 3y ago
No contradiction. "to have a way of" does not mean that something is 100% certain to happen but that it frequently happens.
14.
by cb5r 3y ago
No, I was not trying to imply that. I was saying that praising to not want to change ANYTHING about the way a system works is a way of being happily ignorant. Psychedelics have a way of forcing you out of this ignorance and for some people
15.
by cb5r 3y ago
It is is a structural problem that goes much deeper than what the author thinks. "Sticking to the process" is good and important to SOME (!!!) degree for sure. However, doing this blindly will (1) prevent further progress/adv
16.
by cb5r 3y ago
It is quite obvious that the author has absolutely no idea what psychedelics are, what they can do and what they are used for (both recreationally and therapeutically). I am wondering why anyone would think they are in an adequate position