cassiet

7 ms·

1.
by cassiet 6y ago
Are those words actually weighted with the assumption you are making, or are you just trying to feel better about 800 million people going hungry? The nuance between English words aren’t really apparent in poverty statistics. Because I do
2.
by cassiet 6y ago
Had you spent time in the humanities, you would understand why your argument is fallacious. Science discovers, engineering creates, humanities decide.
3.
by cassiet 6y ago
Said like an ignorant man about a topic they nothing about.
4.
by cassiet 6y ago
What a useless world that would create.
5.
by cassiet 6y ago
Too nerdy isn’t valuable feedback, it’s derogatory.
6.
by cassiet 6y ago
How exactly?
7.
by cassiet 6y ago
Most of HN is shitting on popular things with a hot take and a smug condescending tone, usually erroneously. If Conical hadn’t tried new projects and failed, the poster would complain that they never innovate. People complain like this beca
8.
by cassiet 6y ago
Oh, no, that’s what happens in YOUR mind.
9.
by cassiet 6y ago
Why exactly?
10.
by cassiet 6y ago
There are plenty of good reasons to start to read the article, not quite understand the usage, and come to the comments for clarification. I don’t assume, if I’m not following, that reading more will clear up the confusion. If those reasons
11.
by cassiet 6y ago
The opposing side to RTFM is for you to just “Answer the fucking question”. I don't have issue with people that didn’t read or understand, but I do have issue with your RTFA nonsense. What does this add? Far less value than a question
12.
by cassiet 6y ago
It’s less the obscurity, and more that to a layman, you are saying in the title that modelling doesn't work, or it really doesn’t work. Understanding your audience and all that. Someone should write an article about it so we aren’t mi
13.
by cassiet 6y ago
The headline really cuts off the points nose.
14.
by cassiet 6y ago
I own the hardware.
15.
by cassiet 6y ago
You can expect all you want, I expect you’ll be disappointed. The goal to keep the web in that languid state is of the same ilk of the buggy whip. It’ll have archaic use cases, but the numbers won’t make sense for a lot of if not most fut
16.
by cassiet 6y ago
They aren’t.
17.
by cassiet 6y ago
Accessibility isn’t being discussed here. All my sites are accessible, don’t conflate the two.
18.
by cassiet 6y ago
This isn’t mine, but the number of my users with js turned off isn’t worth the effort. You guys make a lot of noise, but not a lot of traffic.
19.
by cassiet 7y ago
I’m not a fan of asocial, it sounds passive, ambivalent. I’ll keep using anti-social for this, since anti-societal would be more apt for that concept.