capybaraStorm

6 ms·

1.
by capybaraStorm 2y ago
No I don't find it credible. I do find it credible that Jones would latch on to it out of reasons devoid of personal malice, and that even if he thought it wasn't true he would still be incapable of anything other than obsessing
2.
by capybaraStorm 2y ago
p80 is defunct and sold off [0]. A 3d printed frame with fiber filament will last a long time. That is the future, conventional injected molded polymer 80% companies for handgun frames have been sued into oblivion. [0] "This week in g
3.
by capybaraStorm 2y ago
I don't at all agree with what Jones said. I find it disgusting. But you should take a look at some of the videos of the parents. There is one, where the dad is laughing and smiling and suddenly goes up to the microphone and switche
4.
by capybaraStorm 2y ago
The parents won a defamation suit. Nothing was proven beyond a reasonable doubt. That's not even the standard by which civil claims are made. They had some very clever lawyers, that law-fared defamation against the dead into being de
5.
by capybaraStorm 2y ago
Dating is one of those things I was never good at unless I gave up. Maybe it's just me, but my luck was women only wanted me when I was too busy or having too much fun to go looking. I have a terrible poker face and if it seems like I
6.
by capybaraStorm 2y ago
Your cam model acquaintance moved to Dubai, why do you think that is? It is a place full of rich people who want escorts and the price is bidding towards infinity because they're operating on a very toned down version of Shariah law t
7.
by capybaraStorm 2y ago
A baby once crawled out in front of me from behind a wheel in a parked car on a narrow street. The parents were not watching the baby at all, but they scowled at me when I swerved as they realized what I was swerving away from. The parents
8.
by capybaraStorm 2y ago
It's not an exclusive relationship. It is a highly transactional ephemeral one. The basic reproductive qualities of females favor LTR since it takes 9 months at the very least to pop out a kid, during which time mating with other male
9.
by capybaraStorm 2y ago
They are occupying a brief period where sex work is white market enough to not be quite as dangerous or "disgraceful" as the old days, but not accepted or legal enough to be clobbered in competition by everyone else. Feminism and
10.
by capybaraStorm 2y ago
I would probably go for a sob story about why a right-wing conspiracy theorist with a talk show caused me $1B in damages by saying nonsense 99.9% of the US and none of my employers believe. While simultaneously using the notoriety created
11.
by capybaraStorm 2y ago
I always enjoy hearing the dichotomy from various sects of society that simultaneously the immigrants are such drop in the bucket they can be educated for a dozen years at costs that would not be "remotely significant" in measurab
12.
by capybaraStorm 2y ago
Whether their stories about what they dealt with are true or not, they have incredible incentive to make sure they present such dealings as worth a billion dollars. You can't put a price on human life, but if you could surely those ch
13.
by capybaraStorm 2y ago
If you think prosecutions are shams for the elite, wait until you see what they look like against the plebs.
14.
by capybaraStorm 2y ago
That is damn close. This one is quite interesting in and of its twice as long and concerns someone who doesn't have the kind of immunity presidents have recently been under scrutiny for possibly having. Another interesting thing I fou
15.
by capybaraStorm 2y ago
I promise this is an honest question: has ANY president since the civil war reconciliation blanket pardoned someone for an entire decade for all known and unknown federal crimes?
16.
by capybaraStorm 2y ago
The interesting precedent here is if you lie about the dead (who until this fiction, had no protection from defamation), you have defamed any living person who says the opposite and factual information about them. But we all know the preced
17.
by capybaraStorm 2y ago
The argument the lawsuit wasn't about defending the honor of the dead kids while going after the nearest deep pockets is pretty questionable. I don't condone what Jones said but it seems pretty clear to me the reason the parents
18.
by capybaraStorm 2y ago
This is an interesting strategy you've taken. You're basically setting a trap where you want me to specifically go after Alaskans or Arabians to prove my point. I'm not taking the racist bait. I have no reason to think it ca
19.
by capybaraStorm 2y ago
It caused a shitstorm for our family. The prices of houses went 3x in our area due to covid era ~0% interest rate policies, leading me to work so hard to try and keep up I had health issues and was working ~80 hours a week just to be able
20.
by capybaraStorm 2y ago
For much of my child's formative infant year, people were screaming bloody murder if we wanted our infant to develop a sense of facial expression in strangers and in public. They were also hell bent on banning much of the social event
21.
by capybaraStorm 2y ago
They closed them then re-opened them in time for one of the biggest waves of asylum/undocumented immigration in recent history, part of which incentivized bringing children (who often need ESL and cultural integration assistance) who t
22.
by capybaraStorm 2y ago
Death sentence is often seen as better because you might get an individual cell, and copious pro bono appeals for your case.
23.
by capybaraStorm 2y ago
Yes of course. All of this seems to me totally psychotic and not at all a dystopia I want to live in. Which is why I lived in an area with almost no government, very weak police services, little to no code/zone enforcement, weak envi
24.
by capybaraStorm 2y ago
The government has had a very hard time classifying what type of crime drug dealing is. First they said it was a tax crime (well before that, an import or tariff crime). Then the 10th amendment was basically gutted, and it became a crime
25.
by capybaraStorm 2y ago
The contrarian view is that drug dealing is a financial crime of not paying for the credentials of a DEA license, or that fraudulently denying medical claims is a crime of criminal negligence resulting in bodily harm. As for where I started
26.
by capybaraStorm 2y ago
The best question is "do you think wealthy CEOs disproportionately evade justice." One of the more sympathetic views towards the murderer is that there was no legal avenue to pursue the CEO for mass fraud under which the plaintiff
27.
by capybaraStorm 2y ago
My point is he (CEO) is viewed by many as most culpable for fraudulently denied claims at UHC -- and there are crimes, even non-financial ones like drug dealing, that tightly couple level of organization and sales of a product to differenc
28.
by capybaraStorm 2y ago
I am the CEO of insurance company Inc (ICI). Under me is 1000 salesman. Every salesman knows and understands I am selling a plan that will deny or delay for some covered minor ailments that once in a million set off a chain inducing death
29.
by capybaraStorm 2y ago
Even the smallest understanding of utility of money will prove your assertion wildly inaccurate.
30.
by capybaraStorm 2y ago
If you sell a few hits of fentanyl you aren't going to meet the statutory definition of a criminal enterprise and therefore will not be eligible for federal death penalty even though fentanyl induces death. If you sell $100M of fentany

More ›