capitalhilbilly

5 ms·

1.
by capitalhilbilly 5mo ago
If you could only choose from github, gitlab and atlassan then I suppose.. But really anything newer that stays in existance has to be focused on quality from early enough to not be defined by path dependence problems and bad choices like t
2.
by capitalhilbilly 5mo ago
For vulnerabilities of this nature is there really a point in training if an AI will catch them from now on? Seems like a variant of the allowing calculators problem and maybe the problem codeless platforms would have had. If these style of
3.
by capitalhilbilly 5mo ago
This is a need it fails at miserably. k8s reminds me of the raid recentralization anti pattern problem where you fix a hardware failure that never occurs in exchange for knowing simple higher level mistakes or security problems will tank so
4.
by capitalhilbilly 5mo ago
The original standards weren't expecting anyone but carriers to send messages and ramping up security has been a slow process, so downgrade attacks probably work nicely.
5.
by capitalhilbilly 5mo ago
Being stopped that late is a bit different than the US AFAIK, but there is certainly the possibility of being stopped from work and (depending how you react) prevented from leaving the US for purely economic inventions: https://e
6.
by capitalhilbilly 5mo ago
I think its pretty clear that being too early has been as bad as being too late for most technologies. There are a few that have gradually gained community after decades but it is easier to make a poor copy of one of them and have better mo