canada2020

6 ms·

1.
by canada2020 4y ago
By “retail trader”, do you mean you do this all by yourself?
2.
by canada2020 4y ago
I see. Given it’s so flexible, is this pretty much like a caching layer?
3.
by canada2020 4y ago
But when do you refresh the materialized views?
4.
by canada2020 6y ago
It’s almost like the intention is to divide the world and create more segregation rather than to benefit any one group. And the brand sounds very pretentious. Maybe “the trust network” would’ve been better. It’s simply a group where we all
5.
by canada2020 6y ago
Twitter sits at the very top of a stack of technologies. Clearly the internet providers shouldn’t ban specific content, AWS should not either. Since Twitter is the most user facing, does that give it more responsibility to regulate the actu
6.
by canada2020 6y ago
Better recommendation engine
7.
by canada2020 6y ago
Thanks! This is great. It appears that China's argument for Xinjiang are: 1. Anti-terrorism / Religious Extremist Activities 2. Poverty alleviation We have certainly seen similar situations play out in the past (e.g. US & Midd
8.
by canada2020 6y ago
For those of you who are downvoting this comment, it would be much more productive if you just reply and speak your mind here.
9.
by canada2020 6y ago
Right. In addition to Walmart, I think Shopify also has a chance at taking on Amazon, from a different angle. More broadly, all big retailers seem to target Amazon as a common enemy.
10.
by canada2020 6y ago
Yes, this is bad. I think we can all agree on that. But does anyone have sources on _how_ China got into this situation? They wouldn't be detaining Uighurs at this scale for no reason. So what's the history behind this? I left a s
11.
by canada2020 6y ago
Reposting the top comment on the article, was wondering what HN thought about this: ------------------------------------------------------ Godfree Roberts: We created terrorists in Xinjiang, just as we did in Afghanistan. They murdered thou