camphy

8 ms·

1.
by camphy 1mo ago
Yeah as much as I like the idea, I know there will be some brilliant and driven students who would have a hard time with this due to temperament. For me, if I’m excited about something, I can talk for hours. Maybe not so for everyone though
2.
by camphy 1mo ago
I wish we were doing this in the US even before AI was an issue. I suspect it would reorient students to their work in some pretty cool ways. I mean, it might feel like torture for some and maybe that’s not so much a bad thing. I’m sure I’m
3.
by camphy 2mo ago
Did I also miss the part where “likely” was shown to be grounded in anything other than a prejudice about people who have “risky” sex?
4.
by camphy 2mo ago
> Is someone irresponsible enough to pursue causal, unprotected sex with random partners also likely to be responsible enough to visit a doctor proactively and comply with a prep regimen? Yeah, me. What a wild statement to make. It’s a b
5.
by camphy 3mo ago
If you’re referring to a solution to large datasets without not being auditable, she actually did provide a solution. Something to do with data sheets for these training data sets similar to those provided for hardware components. At least,
6.
by camphy 4mo ago
No it doesn’t. Judging by a few of your other comments, you probably just don’t like the flavor of this particular kool-aid. This kind of low-effort, ad hominem comment is typical human-generated slop.
7.
by camphy 1y ago
This is really interesting, but does anyone think this is something that might generalize for ambiguous reasoning situations with more development? I am no expert, but sudoku and puzzles seem like very well-defined problem spaces.