calebio

7 ms·

1.
by calebio 2mo ago
Hey look, the lawn darts are now AI-controlled.
2.
by calebio 2mo ago
Google/Waymo + Uber/Otto comes to mind here with Anthony Levandowski.
3.
by calebio 3mo ago
I think there's a middle ground of people who just are not interested in building or upgrading a gaming computer (or just don't like their typical form factor in the ready to go out of the box gaming PCs) but also don't want
4.
by calebio 3mo ago
Did you just stop scrolling at the first group of people to come and make this comment?
5.
by calebio 3mo ago
You can easily burn through hundreds of dollars researching one or two relatively small court cases. I don't think you should be indigent or go to the courthouse/public library to avoid spending hundreds of dollars for that small
6.
by calebio 3mo ago
Stalking has a specific definition that I'm not sure would apply here. Your behavior on the internet is certainly tracked by corporations. Your phone's radio addresses were (are) tracked as you walk by things. None of that rises t
7.
by calebio 3mo ago
No, it's not. You are not protected from a private company that owns ALPRs as part of the 4th amendment. The government purchasing data from 3rd parties (the third-party doctrine) doesn't violate your 4th amendment rights against
8.
by calebio 3mo ago
> That's not what I'm seeing. My mom always wanted Google to just answer questions, and now ChatGPT can. She uses it enough in her daily life that she bought a subscription. Reminds me a lot of AskJeeves :)
9.
by calebio 3mo ago
> A lower resolution tracking is still tracking though. Spatial resolution is low/fixed doesn’t change the fact that I was tagged using the personally identifiable plate and my movements were tracked across the town. You're not
10.
by calebio 3mo ago
I think the question may instead be: > do you have the right to not have [a private company] tracking your movements and keeping logs of everywhere you’ve been for months or years, especially when you’re not currently suspected of any cr
11.
by calebio 3mo ago
While Carpenter v. United States (2018) somewhat changed the rules regarding the "purchase" of third-party data in the context of an investigation, it seems like the ALPRs do not violate the 4th amendment the same way that the dec
12.
by calebio 3mo ago
The L-Taraval, at least historically, was not reliable between downtown and the outer sunset (past Sunset Blvd).
13.
by calebio 5mo ago
Any idea if/when this would be coming to GHE? I know the release cycle is way different but curious about your thoughts.
14.
by calebio 5mo ago
I miss the Phabricator review UI so much.
15.
by calebio 7mo ago
Have they even filed the forms yet or is this another instance of "let's tweet a thing and let some of the public believe Y (new) while X (old) is actually still true"?
16.
by calebio 7mo ago
Historically, availability was very different between the two countries when we're specifically talking about purchasing SIMs for questionable activity. Physically acquiring the SIMs is only one part of the process as they're pret
17.
by calebio 7mo ago
Not a direct answer to your reuqestion re: questionable activity, but for me it's more about ease of access. A SIM in the U.S. is significantly more difficult to acquire than a SIM in Mexico/many other countries. E.g. - Limit on #
18.
by calebio 10mo ago
> The 1994 paper (freely available at https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc1341727/m2/ ...) is actually about proper E2EE. That paper is about PKI-based session setup for End-End which is t
19.
by calebio 10mo ago
It wasn't coined, it was reused. It historically meant things that were encrypted from the client to the server, e.g. SSH, SSL, TLS, etc. RFC 4949 (Internet Security Glossary, Version 2) from 2007: https://datatracker.ietf.o
20.
by calebio 10mo ago
I'll take the hit on the loose phrasing regarding the SSL paper "outlining plans". That was a poor description of mine of an analysis paper and wasn't a good example of the point I was trying to make. However, you are fo
21.
by calebio 10mo ago
> No, before that it was simply not a term, except in some obscure radio protocol > no one really used the E2EE term before it got the current meaning It most certainly was a term and no it wasn't simply limited to "some obs
22.
by calebio 10mo ago
Well respectfully your recollection is missing lots of references by people that were "knowledgeable in cryptography". You can easily find these references in the literature, often comparing link encryption with end-to-end encrypt
23.
by calebio 10mo ago
The modern usage of E2EE definitely means that "the server cannot access it". That's the meat of this entire discussion. While you are technically correct in a network topology sense (where the "ends" are the TCP c
24.
by calebio 10mo ago
It was pretty common to call client-side encryption/SSL "end to end encryption" among network engineers who were analyzing data flowing through their networks[0] as well as those who were implementing SSL/TLS into their
25.
by calebio 10mo ago
I think part of the problem is that prior to WhatsApp's E2EE implementation in like 2014, TLS was very often called "End to End Encryption" as the ends were Client and Server/Service Provider. It got redefined and now
26.
by calebio 10mo ago
It was only a decade or so ago that "End-To-End Encryption" began to mean something other than "encrypted in transit". E2EE now means something wildly different in the context of messaging applications and the like (sinc
27.
by calebio 1y ago
It's turtles all the way down.
28.
by calebio 1y ago
Usually when you commission something you're asking the artist to do art and create something unique with their own artistic flair... not just line-trace an existing photo. The intention and cost of something like that is not at all co
29.
by calebio 1y ago
> We found that the the Great Flood in the book of Genesis existed Can you elaborate what you mean by the "Great Flood"? There's certainly evidence for regional megafloods, but I'm not aware of any professional geolog
30.
by calebio 1y ago
Is it fair to say that also in your experience, those crucial edge cases/misses accumulate over time, making it even harder to ship things? I've found this a lot in data systems where folks glue stuff together as fast as possible

More ›