cal85

10 ms·

1.
Russia 'intercepts Europe's key satellites'(news.satnews.com)
64 points by cal85 7mo ago|28 comments
2.
by cal85 8mo ago
How do you know this? Not disagreeing, just curious.
3.
by cal85 10mo ago
The problem is FUD. Some guy at a company gets told he has to wait for legal to approve some open source project or initiative that happens to use JS in the name, because his boss heard there’s a trademark issue, and the enthusiasm fades an
4.
by cal85 10mo ago
They thought of that and called the spec ECMAScript instead.
5.
by cal85 10mo ago
Because it’s written in vanilla JS.
6.
by cal85 10mo ago
Camouflage in what sense?
7.
by cal85 10mo ago
Had same issue until I disconnected from Tailscale, in case that helps anyone.
8.
Color Palette Pro(colorpalette.pro)
1 points by cal85 10mo ago|1 comments
9.
by cal85 10mo ago
They seem to be actively working on vertical tabs for Chromium right now: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/q/message:+vertical...
10.
by cal85 11mo ago
> I think there really are people who can visualize that apple. Based on what evidence?
11.
by cal85 11mo ago
True. But it feels like a fairer comparison would be with a huge healthcare company that failed to vet one of its therapists properly, so a crazy pro-suicide therapist slipped through the net. Would we petition to shut down the whole compan
12.
by cal85 11mo ago
It's not an em-dash, it's an en-dash, which is rare in LLM output. Also just stop being insufferable.
13.
by cal85 11mo ago
Or, when you do go looking, it doesn’t feel the same. Why?
14.
by cal85 11mo ago
The last sentence can’t be true. If you go looking for them, they’re easy to find. The problem is you don’t.
15.
by cal85 11mo ago
> That needs to be solved. Seems like an easy solve. Just don't do it. I don’t do it, but I’m not sure how that solves the problem of other people doing it.
16.
by cal85 1y ago
The post says why.
17.
by cal85 1y ago
The difference is that social media now exists. The fear of an embarrassing or compromising moment causing social embarrassment at an unlimited scale or affecting future employment prospects indefinitely is not based on nothing - we hav
18.
by cal85 1y ago
7 gigabytes? With a “G”? That must take 10s of seconds, minutes even. And for what, a ‘good experience’? Humans make no sense to me either.
19.
by cal85 1y ago
> I'm not saying it's wrong but people are reacting to this as if the Times university guide is some objective truth. I can’t see a single example of anyone reacting to it that way.
20.
by cal85 1y ago
The equivalent tailwind is to just put h-8 (or whatever it is) on whichever form elements and buttons you want to be that height. Tailwind recommends you never use `@apply` - it’s basically an escape hatch for weird, niche interop requireme
21.
by cal85 1y ago
Billions of people willingly use banks, fast food chains etc. all the time.
22.
by cal85 1y ago
I’d like to see an example!
23.
by cal85 1y ago
yeah I can read it ok
24.
by cal85 1y ago
I don’t understand what you mean, but I’d like to. I think it is obvious that we all need subscriptions to survive (if “we” means free adults, and excluding people who steal etc). Do you not agree? Please spell it out for me, I’m honestly i
25.
by cal85 1y ago
Don’t we all need subscriptions to stay alive?
26.
by cal85 1y ago
Also the social penalty for being a grass, the risk of major embarrassment if you’re mistaken or if it can’t be proved, the risk of running into the accused person later outside. It doesn’t make any sense.
27.
by cal85 1y ago
fair I retract “is not remotely relevant here” and offer “is not really relevant here”
28.
by cal85 1y ago
nope, fire your lawyer. you get a common law trademark by trading under a name. no need to register it. TM registration is just to streamline big corps chasing after lots of small abusers in a wackamole way, that’s all. if the abuse in ques
29.
by cal85 1y ago
also trademark registration is not remotely relevant here
30.
by cal85 1y ago
compliance with a github policy isn't really the issue lol

More ›