byyyy

6 ms·

1.
by byyyy 3y ago
four feet.
2.
by byyyy 3y ago
Thanks for your response. I want to continue the conversation on bats so I won't respond about the other stuff. Take a look at this. The bats are walking on all fours: https://youtu.be/ewmydjekJnU?t=62 This is not a vu
3.
by byyyy 3y ago
True, but the volume of information in the world today is too overwhelming for one person to evaluate correctly. We live in the information age after all. Most people don't have the faculties to do a proper evaluation that includes bot
4.
by byyyy 3y ago
I'm ok with your language. I found the "competent in English" rather immature and juvenile, but it's not a big deal and really minor. I also understand that you might not realize how heated this sub thread was as the oth
5.
by byyyy 3y ago
Wall is undamaged. Car is damaged. In that case nothing happens. (In CA, where this took place)
6.
by byyyy 3y ago
>I absolutely disagree. Sometimes your only choice is fight or submit, and I would rather live free than die a slave. Sometimes that is the only choice. On that we can agree. Unfortunately when it comes to China that is clearly not only
7.
by byyyy 3y ago
Nobody knows the exact definition of consciousness. It's a made up word with a vague definition. The catch is the vagueness of the definition is also made up so it's all bullshit anyway. Either way when we communicate in English w
8.
by byyyy 3y ago
Bro, everyones on the censorship side of the boot. You're on the "not knowing anything side" because you don't live there you just read the bullshit headlines. I've lived and experienced it. The majority doesn'
9.
by byyyy 3y ago
>I feel these statements at least partly stem from contrarian origins. We have a huge supply of facts as to why China indeed is a fascist totalitarian state - look at what happened to Hong Kong as an example. Pooling these facts into ”US
10.
by byyyy 3y ago
> I think most people would say that when you don't experience time passing, you're not conscious at that time. (For example, when you're asleep and not dreaming.) It's pretty clear that a chatbot cannot experience ti
11.
by byyyy 3y ago
It does bring up the temp, I apologize for including you in that. I appreciate your reply.
12.
by byyyy 3y ago
Bats are quadrupeds. When they walk they walk like a pterodactyl with the elbow of the wing. They don't stand on their hind legs. See the vampire bat. Additionally the "broad" definition from Merriam Websters covers it. These
13.
by byyyy 3y ago
>no program is running Not true. This is irrational. A program runs when you input a query and it generates a response. There is nothing that says consciousness must be always running. When you ask me a question and I answer it... In tha
14.
by byyyy 3y ago
I'm curious about the AI at Google that was claimed by a person who has since been fired to be conscious. I mean I know everyone was attacking him but in a way I suspect it's similar to a lot of the unreasonable dismissive attitud
15.
by byyyy 3y ago
Also, I don't know if you noticed. But this nuance in the definition of the word paw was addressed by chatGPT.
16.
by byyyy 3y ago
Birds don't have paws because they aren't quadrupeds according to websters. Bats walk on fours. They are quadrupeds therefore they have paws according to Merriam Webster. Why don't you address the point I brought up? I alread
17.
by byyyy 3y ago
I'm serious. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/paw Look up the definition of a paw. I think you have a sort of mixed up definition of what it is. Possibly a different definition used among your "bat
18.
by byyyy 3y ago
>It might be a small risk but it's absolutely not his call to make. Traffic accidents is one of the largest causes of death in this country. When you drive you make the same call. He aimed his plane at a specific location 100%. This
19.
by byyyy 3y ago
Where did you get the idea that I said jail is exclusively for murderers? I didn't say that. You should read. You going to drive has extremely high risk of killing somebody. Traffic accidents are some of the highest causes of death in
20.
by byyyy 3y ago
https://www.vocabulary.com/dictionary/paw As long as it has claws according to vocabulary dot com it is a paw.
21.
by byyyy 3y ago
> but bats don't have paws. Bat paw: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/e1/Bat_in_a... ChatGPT was totally in tune with this concept. The appendage on the elbow of the wing can be a
22.
by byyyy 3y ago
>Right, but as a society we have taken the position that we don’t trust people to correctly aim unguided gliding missiles at safe bits of ground. We therefore require pilots to not get out of their plane mid flight. Even if this guy got
23.
by byyyy 3y ago
Agreed he should be in trouble for that. But probably not jailtime.
24.
by byyyy 3y ago
>You keep using that word "expert" and I don't doubt they're experts in machine learning, GAN and NNs but at this point what we're looking for is experts in what intelligence IS and the problem is .. nobody knows
25.
by byyyy 3y ago
If experts don't have merit, then what person has merit? Non experts like you and I?
26.
by byyyy 3y ago
The article isn't doing anything more then quoting experts in the field. From the article: “It is certainly much more than a stochastic parrot, and it certainly builds some representation of the world—although I do not think that it is
27.
by byyyy 3y ago
Can the CEO fire the CTO if the CTO isn't performing well? If not who is really the CEO?
28.
by byyyy 3y ago
>You seem awfully hung up on the Hollywood effects being overblown. Yes, this is true and no one is arguing against it. However, even a small spark can start a forest fire. I'm hung up on it because the likelihood of this happening
29.
by byyyy 3y ago
>Anyone who intensionally crashes a huge hunk of metal into pubic land, causing a significant hazard, and exposing the public to stupid risks for "views" absolutely deserves significant jail-time No people who slaughters others
30.
by byyyy 3y ago
>So you think it's okay that someone might just crash a fucking airplane on top of your head because of fucking likes? What's the point of this question when you know I'm not ok with it. There is no point, so don't as

More ›