bytelines

7 ms·

1.
by bytelines 4y ago
Nah this was a 300IQ pro gamer move. Cunningham's Law.
2.
by bytelines 4y ago
k
3.
by bytelines 4y ago
It's a troll. "Optional activities" gets translated to "mandatory" and a game is "far more important" yet apparently in such a game nobody really likes each other, too.
4.
by bytelines 4y ago
What is to prevent the network from facilitating money laundering and purchase of illegal goods?
5.
by bytelines 4y ago
I'm very confused by both of your points. The supply of a cryptocurrency is equal to a person? A crypto token is not a person so I'm guessing you missed a few words there? How is building a competing chain to more efficiently solv
6.
by bytelines 4y ago
That creates opprotunities for other Level 1 chains. Solana for example charges $0.00025 per transaction (however this is still denominated in the SOL currency so it will fluctuate). Hedera network is $0.0001 per transaction and is fixed in
7.
by bytelines 4y ago
Would lightning network approach comply with KYC laws?
8.
by bytelines 4y ago
SLA is simply an intent to provide a level of service. If that can't be met, then there'd be an agreement on what the consequence of that was. Don't meet an availability SLA and maybe you get some credit back. You can't
9.
by bytelines 4y ago
Maybe a key distinction here is that TCB itself is not trustless - it requires KYC, etc. But where data is stored and redeemed is on the trustless, decentralized Hedera network. It functions as an automated, secure ledger. You could replace
10.
by bytelines 4y ago
The hedera network is autonomous and decentralized - TCB built on top of it. So to issue or redeem your coupon you'd need to participate in TCB, but as a result you'd be able to issue your coupons directly to consumers and then an
11.
by bytelines 4y ago
The technology doesn't have to solve all problems to have economic value. Arguably the "cash alternative" problem is a fundamental problem of coupons themselves. And as you point out, these are not new problems, and does an i
12.
by bytelines 4y ago
Here's a more concrete example: coupons. I, as a supplier, want to prevent coupon fraud - a ~300M year problem. Today they mitigate this with trust relationships between retailers and distributers, which consequentially means that coup
13.
by bytelines 4y ago
He said he feels sad, not that it was unfair. Sad that, for reasons Will makes very clear, he could not forgive.
14.
by bytelines 4y ago
If you don't smoke Tarrlytons...f** you!
15.
by bytelines 4y ago
> This is an application built with least privilege in mind Uh huh, makes sense > Named SuperUser Uhh... It lists all the operations that it can't do, but not what it can do. Can they download a private SAML certificate? Can they
16.
by bytelines 5y ago
I wonder if this extends to non-solicitation of employees agreements
17.
by bytelines 5y ago
The Kinzhal does not enter space, therefore no space-based intercept is applicable. The Avangard is an example of a FOBS - will the space based intercept be able to intercept a FOBS vehicle? I'm unclear. Is it really necessary to lead
18.
by bytelines 5y ago
Same with hypersonic missiles: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kh-47M2_Kinzhal https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Avangard_(hypersonic_glide_veh...
19.
by bytelines 5y ago
I'm sorry - I'll try to be kinder. To explain myself, I too was put off by your dismissiveness of Googles own key contributions. But that doesn't mean I can't say that kindly. For whatever it's worth, you have a ver
20.
by bytelines 5y ago
Because Docker is also innovative? What is your argument here? If Google doesn't innovate everything, it can't be innovative? This is nonsense.
21.
by bytelines 5y ago
> Google just threw big numbers at it to make sure they took the biggest piece of the pie. And, ya know, invented cgroups and everything.
22.
by bytelines 5y ago
The insider trading training is an excellent example: it does not benefit the company, and is done at an individual level, so the training reflects what the law says and what is not allowed. Individuals may break that. Say that you are part
23.
by bytelines 5y ago
> This is true always, which is why the advice this person got is also commonly given in lots of forms. For example, doctors are often trained in being careful in what they write down for the same reason. Alternative take: it is indeed f
24.
by bytelines 5y ago
I see! Thank you for taking the time to write that out, much appreciated.
25.
by bytelines 5y ago
> Different tools take different approach to solve that issue there. systemd take approach that is derived from launchd - do not do stuff, that is not needed. It achieved that by merging D-Bus into the systemd itself, and then making all
26.
by bytelines 5y ago
This is equivalent to claiming riding an airline doesn't emit any CO2 because the plane was going to fly anyways
27.
by bytelines 5y ago
Oh you've provided much more than that lol
28.
by bytelines 5y ago
I dont really have much to say about your political rant other than to point out the irony of some reality denying ideologist misrepresenting what people think or say being a central theme in your argument.
29.
by bytelines 5y ago
It isn't. It just makes it cheap and easy. Its not a problem for a government agency to run a PKI, and for verifying identities they probably should. But what about smaller entities, or even individuals. And what if they don't wan
30.
by bytelines 5y ago
Yes, exactly. And now think of all the limitations of running a PKI. For many use cases, Crypto doesn't do things a PKI can't. It just does them without some of those limitations.

More ›