byecancer21

6 ms·

1.
by byecancer21 1y ago
Effectively, this is government-mandated bundling. Now you must buy the extra service when taking a flight, whether you require it or not.
2.
by byecancer21 2y ago
The German state is also helping public health insurers hide their dirty secret: in hundreds of thousands of cases, denials were legally flawed and the cases have to be reviewed. They refuse to do so on the behest of politics as a small num
3.
by byecancer21 3y ago
AF also tried to pull the codeshare thing with me once. Didn't want to go around in circles with customer service and found it easier to initiate litigation. AF then hired a big law firm to defend the tiny case. A week before a schedul
4.
by byecancer21 4y ago
One way to think about this: as a founder you charge your seed investors, whose capital you deploy, say 85% (preferences notwithstanding). Why wouldn't you do it all on your own and retain 100%? Capital inflow is a multiplier for your
5.
by byecancer21 4y ago
My rate for private health insurance in Germany is nearly 9.6k EUR/yr, not including family. This is a contract so terms can vary. Here: zero deductible, vision and dental included, international coverage including US. Includes a savin
6.
by byecancer21 4y ago
This mirrors my personal experience. To make a treatment decision, against the advice of my local doctors, that was key to survival I relied on US research. To compare costs: For an extremely rare cancer, total cost of treatment was 100k EU
7.
by byecancer21 5y ago
I appreciate the offer. Otherwise I did have a superb experience with the medical system, that is real doctors not state workers with lapsed qualification.
8.
by byecancer21 5y ago
I have nothing personally against the guy, responding to personal asks for a favor is inappropriate but simply how such things work. This is simply a means to achieve the strictly necessary: to have two criminal offenders amongst judges rem
9.
by byecancer21 5y ago
Thank you for your wishes. For future needs I was able to return to private health insurance which suffers from no such problem. However this cannot cover claims arisen prior to policy issue, so the subject matter remains open. No judge rul
10.
by byecancer21 5y ago
This has realistically no more than a 10-15% chance of succeeding, not dissimilar to a startup. For either, it is perhaps better to not get attached too much to a specific outcome.
11.
by byecancer21 5y ago
Consider I had just survived a rare cancer that kills nearly everyone who gets it quickly, then when addressing a serious side effect from treatment this happens. Not claiming any moral high ground here. Many would descend into anger and de
12.
by byecancer21 5y ago
I appreciate your concern. Her own staffer did ask me some time ago, unprompted, if she too must fear criminal charges. There exists proof of this. I do feel bad for her and even the judge's superior, the court president, who I believe
13.
by byecancer21 5y ago
Note I did nothing to manipulate the top court. The application was phrased politely and only hinted at a crime background. Severe procedural errors including denial of access to court files alone justified a reversal, besides the blatant m
14.
by byecancer21 5y ago
Not being able to tell if the facts are true I see why one might be inclined to think as much. I did discuss the matter with friends throughout the course of events to assure my own sanity however, also because certain aspects are in our vi
15.
by byecancer21 5y ago
To clarify, the "way out" was simply a new filing for an interim order based on the novel fact that a potentially lethal complication had just occurred in connection with the case. I substantiated this with medical and research ev
16.
by byecancer21 5y ago
The judge felt safe to commit an overt serious crime due to her husband. He is the conditio sine qua non without which this the entire matter had not happened. He could make a choice. Either talk to me or influence the court. The choice he
17.
by byecancer21 5y ago
I did not ask her or any judge to resign. This was a proposal to the prosecutor's office prior to filing any of the serious charges and triggering certain events then required from them by law. Unlike public officials I was fully withi
18.
by byecancer21 5y ago
Honestly not so sure. This appears to be a fairly corrupt nation as a baseline so many may find this matter not all that surprising. His appointment a few years ago was controversial within legal circles. Unlike SCOTUS, Constitutional Court
19.
by byecancer21 5y ago
This was a fun thing sent three days before the election, which his party was expected to lose. The same judge was vice-leader of this party until his appointment and is known to be ultra-catholic. Such writing is obviously not directed at
20.
by byecancer21 5y ago
I expect all cases are going to be retried. As a criminal defense strategy the judge made a claim she "felt threatened" for an extremely long duration including all of her decisions. I have thus filed for nullification, since her
21.
by byecancer21 5y ago
You interpret this as an ultimatum, I see offering them a way out as being nice. At the same time one has to assert seeing through obvious b-s. What is appropriate gets decided by lawmakers not judges. Once judges willfully violate the code
22.
by byecancer21 5y ago
Different standards apply for judges within proceedings, especially those making decisions at the very top. I did offer each offender a second chance, as I thought they might have learned from this. They chose not to take it. The first inst
23.
by byecancer21 5y ago
I did consider this and protected myself by letting the judges know in a side letter about some background. Obviously would not have pursued this matter if I wasn't a fairly well-connected person and Covid-19 restrictions made availabl
24.
by byecancer21 5y ago
For clarification, evidence for the bribery claim is only circumstantial at this point, which is also made clear in the record. The other claims however are substantiated with strong evidence encompassing intent.
25.
by byecancer21 5y ago
Sorry, this is unexpectedly blowing up. Had wrongly assumed few people would care about the matter. Should be back up soon with Cloudflare caching.
26.
by byecancer21 5y ago
I don't believe or have claimed this will "change history". Had in fact offered to let the whole matter slide if and only if two judges ruling on health insurance matters hand in their resignations, as I consider them a dange
27.
by byecancer21 5y ago
https://de.wickepedia.org/File:20210328-rittweger.cover.reda... The resolution some months later: https://de.wickepedia.org/File:20211014-lsg-wicke-cover.pdf The court was unable to print pages due to a css
28.
by byecancer21 5y ago
The medical reviewer, a public employee, had ruled on a matter she was not professionally qualified for. The court asked the patient's doctor for facts as they routinely do, which left no room for denial. The judge dropped this documen
29.
by byecancer21 5y ago
Well aware of the politics. The play here was to predict the ways corruption works and use their own moves against the other side. Obstruction of justice can already be shown to have occurred within the prosecutor's office, in a case a
30.
by byecancer21 5y ago
Had ended up in hospital with a potentially lethal complication in connection. It won't be me going to prison. None of the stuff published so far is writing targeted at the general public, it is directed at people involved who are awar

More ›