bwilliams18

10 ms·

1.
by bwilliams18 3mo ago
That was the joke of the parent comment.
2.
by bwilliams18 7mo ago
There's a big difference between runaway costs and these costs over here, which are 10-20% higher than we think makes sense, especially compared to what we're spending over here. Let's spend some time figuring out how to redu
3.
by bwilliams18 7mo ago
I'd argue that a models ability to ignore/manage/sift through the noise added to the training set from other LLMs increases in importance and value as time goes on.
4.
by bwilliams18 9mo ago
It's all technical test footage used to test their media pipelines – presumably, they're sharing it to create industry standards, particularly for partner and open-source library implementations.
5.
by bwilliams18 1y ago
Another even more modern example is The Martian. Weir published it chapter by chapter on his website, even updating previous chapters based on (mostly technical) feedback from his readers. Once completed, his readers encouraged him to publi
6.
by bwilliams18 1y ago
Is there a canonical definition of hacker as described in this post and (at it's best) this community? I always feel strong gravitation to this term, but also feel nervous about embracing it because of it's criminal connotations i
7.
by bwilliams18 2y ago
Postgres has a module called unaccent[0] that removes diacritics for filtering. I expect your browser is doing something similar. While not appropriate when looking for exact matches, when doing user-input based searches, this should probab
8.
by bwilliams18 2y ago
You're confusing Eric Adams with Donald Trump.
9.
by bwilliams18 2y ago
Others have not been so lucky https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/kyle-busch...
10.
by bwilliams18 2y ago
I wonder how much effort it really takes to release a game for both PS4 and PS5, especially if you're already building it for Xbox and PC. PC requires you to support a wide array of performance capabilities, at least in theory making i
11.
by bwilliams18 2y ago
I doubt the NYT's tech stack requires intervention of engineers or product or design people to get out a physical or digital edition of the paper.
12.
by bwilliams18 2y ago
Who is SBF going to flip on up the chain? The Feds give deals to people lower on the hierarchy to get the people at the top (in this case, in their judgement, SBF alone).
13.
by bwilliams18 2y ago
High enough to clear the fiduciary duty bar of acceptance, but not so high that the acquirer feels like they're over paying.
14.
by bwilliams18 3y ago
Elon's asking for specific performance (IE they uphold the agreement) not damages.
15.
by bwilliams18 3y ago
There's no bright line. But jurisprudence puts it somewhere below 375 subscribers to a newsletter. https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2023-11-02/the-ba... (Journalism Section)
16.
by bwilliams18 3y ago
But it is ultimately what will result in a CEO departure.
17.
by bwilliams18 3y ago
they're extracting the cargo from the earth at the top of the hill.
18.
by bwilliams18 4y ago
Enforcement is what discourages manipulation. The SEC could make a case that Elon intentionally manipulated the stock, (particularly with his late and then mis-filing of the 13G and 13D), that he then announced he was going to join the boar
19.
by bwilliams18 4y ago
Yes, it probably would, he did file the correct form as he was joining the board.
20.
by bwilliams18 5y ago
The carbonation is the difference. It will explode as it becomes a slush and make a massive mess.
21.
by bwilliams18 5y ago
[1] https://topclassactions.com/lawsuit-settlements/employment-l...
22.
by bwilliams18 5y ago
That assumes that everyone, and every algo would take those metrics and translate and interpret them into a consistent share price. The value of any company, is only loosely linked to it's performance at any given point in time, and is
23.
by bwilliams18 6y ago
Matt Levine did a pretty good job explaining why it probably doesn't fit the traditional definition of market manipulation in his newsletter on Tuesday[1], see the second section titled "But is it securities fraud?" [1] https
24.
by bwilliams18 6y ago
It appears not. https://developer.apple.com/forums/thread/127350
25.
by bwilliams18 6y ago
I don't think OPs frustration was with 'sherlocking' Growl, but with Apple's stance on iOS and the increasing 'lockedownedness' of MacOS. The MacOS community, and I think many MacOS developers accept that &#x27
26.
by bwilliams18 6y ago
The cohorts are similarly profitable when they get to 2020, the year when there was a massive pandemic that forced everyone to order in all of the time.
27.
by bwilliams18 6y ago
Allworth on Exponent and Ben Thompson (his co-host on Exponent) have both explained that Clay was in fact wrong about iPhone being non-disruptive because he didn't understand the ultimate value of the iPhone, and got stuck in the hardw
28.
by bwilliams18 6y ago
Taiwan.
29.
by bwilliams18 6y ago
And the average age of a car on the road is 11.9 years, so all new cars are zero emission by 2035 and nearly half of the cars on the road are zero emission by 2045 when energy generation is 100% clean. This sounds like exactly the right pla
30.
by bwilliams18 6y ago
My guess: There are people inside apple that rely on and value LittleSnitch and they have enough influence to work with the development team and ensure APIs are built to align with Apple's Security/Privacy goals while still allowi

More ›