buzzovich

5 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by buzzovich 11mo ago

   Ah, you're misunderstanding. I'm not measuring "cognition." See, it's much simpler. Concrete test setup: - Flawed codebase given to agents for review - Agent A: Standard behavioural instructions - Agent B:
2. 2.▲
   by buzzovich 11mo ago

   You keep reinforcing my point. Absolutely true that folk psychology impregnates CS. I mean, look at Churchland. Totally spot on with stuff being flawed. I am not disputing that. It is flawed. I agree. But what if those flaws impregnate a sy
3. 3.▲
   by buzzovich 11mo ago

   Again, I agree. Cognition is way too vague a term. You're actually making the argument FOR what I'm saying. From what I can see, Buzsáki says "cognition" is bad for neuroscience BECAUSE it's philosophically loaded.
4. 4.▲
   by buzzovich 11mo ago

   You're right about substrate. But you're missing the point about utility. I'm not debating the term is wrong. It IS wrong. I agree. THat's kind of my point. I'm saying a wrong term is yielding measurably positive re