buvanshak

7 ms·

1.
by buvanshak 8y ago
Oh fuck off already! This place is full of idiots, that I am not banned already is an insult to me.
2.
by buvanshak 8y ago
Devil is much better. It just wants us to sin. And it won't do nothing if we don't sin. Capitalism is much worse. It asks us to pay. It ask us to work. And if you don't yield, you are pretty much doomed, right here on earth.
3.
by buvanshak 8y ago
> I worked at Hyperloop One for a time, You just lost your credibility.
4.
by buvanshak 8y ago
To be clear, I am not villainous capitalism. It is just an observation. One such as, "predators will single out and target the weak prey". I was trying to make it clear that people involved here are often helpless due to the press
5.
by buvanshak 8y ago
Capitalism will try to exploit every human weakness. If we have a population of people who are not aware of the intricacies involved in self driving, and the current technical state of the art, it is pretty clear there would be entities who
6.
by buvanshak 8y ago
In other words, it is just something that you think. mm. Thought so.
7.
by buvanshak 8y ago
Apart from this, our brains (actually brains of all things that have to hunt/be hunted) are extremely good at detecting motion, especially at the peripherals. This makes us extremely good at detecting stuff like a pedestrian who is abo
8.
by buvanshak 8y ago
Have you used Elm and if yes, what do you think about it. As far as I have seen, it blows everything out of the water for me. It feels a bit weird at first, and It may not be just there yet in terms of features, but the paradigm is solid.
9.
by buvanshak 8y ago
>It was thought that.. Do you have a citation for that?
10.
by buvanshak 8y ago
>because they very specifically claimed that doing it at all was flat out technically impossible They claimed what was technically impossible?
11.
by buvanshak 8y ago
> But now we have an 80% reusable orbital launch system and he’s working hard on the other 20%. Has the reused items proven reliable and profitable in he long run, which was the only reason others were not doing the same...
12.
by buvanshak 8y ago
Not sure. Did finishing in 1/10th time part of the contract? If not, then it we can think of the '10 times faster' claim to be bullshit which was only meant to win the bid...
13.
by buvanshak 8y ago
Sorry. Cars have a slightly more potential to kill than bras and vending machines and people dying of natural causes..
14.
by buvanshak 8y ago
I use nvims terminal because. 1. I don't want to learn a bunch of new key bindings to switch between terminal and editor windows. With nvim, I can use the same process that I use to switch between buffers, to switch to a terminal windo
15.
by buvanshak 8y ago
There is a component of internet that enables exploitation. And there is a component of internet that enables empowerment. People, by default, will consume stuff that enables exploitation (Ads, Facebook and its friends, porn etc). Very few
16.
by buvanshak 8y ago
>No, the point you're pretending I'm missing is that there is this potential No. You are not missing the potential. But you do not seem to get difference in magnitude. One is incremental, reviewed safety enhancement, Other is u
17.
by buvanshak 8y ago
The AEFI with polio vaccines are often worse, and it is not autism that scare concerned people off. In India, the conditions in which these vaccines are administrated are truly pathetic. In most places these are Administrated by government
18.
by buvanshak 8y ago
Please also read the second article. It is from 'The Hindu', one of the most (if not the most) respected news papers in India.
19.
by buvanshak 8y ago
If that is so, Bill Gates is stupid. Because anyone with enough resources can make polio virus in a lab.. [1] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1490301/
20.
by buvanshak 8y ago
>One theory I’ve heard from antivaxxers is that that polio is still widespread, even within the US, but doctors refuse to diagnose it Please take a look at this [1] & [2]. It is similar to what you are saying. [1] https://
21.
by buvanshak 8y ago
>I never disagreed that there was potential for the safety to be negatively impacted with every update... The point you are missing is that while update might be slightly enhance safety, the negative, unpredictable impact might be catast
22.
by buvanshak 8y ago
>99% of Tesla owners follow these instructions. There will of course be 1% drivers who will not. Where did you pull those numbers from?
23.
by buvanshak 8y ago
>we knew that continual burning of coal and other fossil fuels would cause considerable warming. Wrong. We didn't know that. We hoped the co2 will be cleaned up by the mechanisms already in place, and we thought the effect would onl
24.
by buvanshak 8y ago
>I'm sure I can prove ESP and I'm not a telepath. Seriously, it is so common, that the big question is why I was blind to it. In simple experiments, with hardly any effort, I see ESP confirmed, daily. That is: mind to mind cont
25.
by buvanshak 8y ago
Dude, that is not an attack. Only if you have written software, you ll be aware of how seemingly innocent changes can break it in unexpected ways...And your "proof" article does not change anything...
26.
by buvanshak 8y ago
They have also been asked to rename the "Autopilot" feature.. https://www.forbes.com/sites/bertelschmitt/2016/10/14/german...
27.
by buvanshak 8y ago
>You clearly don't know what deduce means. Please explain. >You've also clearly haven't understood anything I've said during this entire conversation. Oh I understood you just fine. I just find it stupid. >You&#
28.
by buvanshak 8y ago
>There’s no evidence that the impact on the extremely low density part of the atmosphere makes any kind of environmental problem That is what people thought about automobiles emitting co2. If we have learned anything, we would be extreme
29.
by buvanshak 8y ago
I applaud your mental gymnastics by which you put full self driving to be similar to that of remodeling of a house. I have nothing else to add. Thanks for the laughs.
30.
by buvanshak 8y ago
> there communication is enough to deduce the limits of their technology.. Not deducing. By what they explicitly state in the manual. About the "need to keep hands on the wheel always". So again. I am not "deducing" i

More ›