busterb

7 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by busterb 8y ago

   The Intel IXP Microengine (Now Netronome?) architecture supported this explicitly. You could schedule a memory read explicitly, do other things, then come back. Each core was also 8-way multi-threaded, and you could yield explicitly to the
2. 2.▲
   Reversing the Cisco ASA 5505(community.rapid7.com)

   3 points by busterb 10y ago|0 comments
3. 3.▲
   by busterb 12y ago

   We wanted to also push out releases faster than OpenBSD's 6 month cycle. Maybe we should have started at 5.6.0. I dunno, hindsight is 20/20.
4. 4.▲
   by busterb 12y ago

   The question of whether LibreSSL has fixes for OpenSSL issues comes up frequently enough that it made sense to note it directly. Fixes and improvements have certainly been shared between the Boring, Open and LibreSSL teams, and we look forw
5. 5.▲
   by busterb 12y ago

   The LibreSSL version scheme corresponds to OpenBSD version numbers: 2.0.x -> OpenBSD 5.6, 2.1.x -> OpenBSD 5.7, 2.2.x -> OpenBSD 5.8, Development slowed approaching the end of 2.1.x as the OpenBSD tree went in release mode lockdown
6. 6.▲
   by busterb 12y ago

   If you don't mind elaborating a bit more on the troubles you had, I might be able to help get things fixed for a later release. I have had some trouble on Solaris getting the adjtime olddelta value to settle quickly, but haven't h
7. 7.▲
   by busterb 12y ago

   Check out the new features page as well. It has some interesting and unique capabilities that I didn't know about before I started the porting work. http://openntpd.org/features.html