bugufu8f83

8 ms·

1.
by bugufu8f83 5d ago
>The author put zero rational thought into this. If Anthropic is legally required to release the weights of any publicly accessible model, their logical response will just be to stop offering public models. I mean... that's the enti
2.
by bugufu8f83 14d ago
Based on her comments in the paper it sounds like she was aware that an AI result was coming and rushed to release her work beforehand. 240 was not a tight bound from her methods.
3.
by bugufu8f83 2mo ago
>QQ for all the pro players out there, for 6 or 9-ring poker, can solvers really solve every scenario - or there is simply too many permutations. Solvers can only solve using restricted game trees. Generally only heads-up pots, for one--
4.
by bugufu8f83 2mo ago
>I spend quite a lot of time reading and writing on Reddit, and while I encounter plenty of low-quality posts and comments, I'd say that essentially none of them are written by bots. Err... I spend quite a lot of time on Reddit as w
5.
by bugufu8f83 2mo ago
I basically completely disagree with your analysis. I am already taking into account the "understanding vs doing" distinction in my assessment. I think it takes ~an undergraduate math education to have the background to work throu
6.
by bugufu8f83 2mo ago
I certainly do not think that the average HN reader "could probably understand this post in a matter of days or weeks". I think the level of background information you need is something like an undergraduate degree in mathematics
7.
by bugufu8f83 2mo ago
To be clear, this is not the kind of thing where a Lean formalization provides any value at all. It's like formalizing the answer to a high school algebra problem. The counterexample is obviously correct.
8.
by bugufu8f83 2mo ago
They are certainly much less accessible than they used to be. Not only has torrenting lost a lot of mindshare and general cultural awareness from 15-20 years ago, but the sites are generally harder to get into. If you're starting from
9.
by bugufu8f83 2mo ago
I'm not sure why people keep bringing up Netflix. Last I checked, they weren't a music streaming service. There's a huge difference in Spotify for music vs Netflix for TV and movies. Netflix's catalog is absolutely tiny.
10.
by bugufu8f83 2mo ago
Yeah, that's all part of what I meant by "a kind of retro nostalgia". People enjoy the experience of buying vinyl and of putting on vinyl records. I don't think there's anything wrong with this, for what it's w
11.
by bugufu8f83 2mo ago
This is complete bullshit, sorry. Digital is more capable of faithfully reproducing sound than vinyl is. Vinyl does not have technical advantages when it comes to faithful sound reproduction. I mean, it literally degrades over time, for chr
12.
by bugufu8f83 2mo ago
>If you have simple tastes, easily accept holes in their catalog and don't care about being served butchered "remasters". People who actually care don't use Netflix/Spotify. Oh please, spare me the condescending
13.
by bugufu8f83 2mo ago
First of all, vinyl is still relatively niche in absolute terms. Second of all, the popularity of vinyl, such as it is, has absolutely nothing to do with availability. It's largely driven by a kind of retro nostalgia (as the technology
14.
by bugufu8f83 2mo ago
If you take issue with the claim that everyone streams music these days than the only way I can understand your comment is by assuming we live in vastly different cultures. Certainly in the US everyone uses streaming to listen to music. Thi
15.
by bugufu8f83 2mo ago
That's an interesting question. I'm not sure. We sort of had that one-stop shop experience with Netflix's DVD service, where you would pay a subscription fee and in exchange you would get to watch movies from a huge catalog.
16.
by bugufu8f83 2mo ago
>It's important to remember that to this day, streaming sites do not have a full archive of the music out there. There is still a need for music piracy Ehhh..... I'd wager that pretty much anything that most people want to list
17.
by bugufu8f83 4mo ago
It still makes absolutely no sense. First of all, this is not currently a bomb threat up until someone actually makes a threat. Second of all, in the event that somebody does make a threat, the existence of a Bluetooth device named "
18.
by bugufu8f83 4mo ago
You're normally not allowed to trade derivatives during the IPO lockup period. Otherwise it would defeat the whole point.
19.
by bugufu8f83 4mo ago
I personally think B5 is a better show than The Expanse, but I don't mind the dated visuals or the occasional bit of campy acting or whatever. The storytelling is absolutely first-rate.
20.
by bugufu8f83 4mo ago
You gave two statements which are different from what I quoted. The idea of "defend[ing] the United States and other democracies" and "defeat[ing] our autocratic adversaries" are always the stated reasons for US military
21.
by bugufu8f83 4mo ago
Their statement on this issue opened by emphasizing how eager they are to help kill people: >I believe deeply in the existential importance of using AI to defend the United States and other democracies, and to defeat our autocratic adver
22.
by bugufu8f83 4mo ago
Your solution to "I would like to know how the original non-translated version is like." is to recommend translation software? And the idea of disregarding professional translations in favor of LLMs for quality reasons is breathta
23.
by bugufu8f83 5mo ago
Yes, looking at their profile it does look that way for all their contributions on HN. Ctrl+F "real" and Ctrl+F "genuine" as one quick indicator--AI absolutely loves these adjectives and their forms right now.
24.
by bugufu8f83 5mo ago
Just because those things don't contribute to your final grade doesn't mean you don't do them. At Oxbridge, for CS we still had lab work. We still had problem sets assigned for CS and for math which were graded. We had one la
25.
by bugufu8f83 7mo ago
I'm all for people who aren't native English speakers publishing their thoughts and opinions. But I would much prefer they still wrote down their own thoughts in their own words in their native language and machine translated it.
26.
by bugufu8f83 7mo ago
>I agree completely. I know everyone is tired of AI accusations but this article has all of the telltale signs of LLM writing over and over again. I mean, I'm more worried about the AI writing itself than people calling it out. The
27.
by bugufu8f83 7mo ago
>And this gives away why they do it: the long-term aim is to cultivate voting rings to influence the narratives and rankings in the future. For now, this is only my theory but it may be a real monetization strategy for them. I don't
28.
by bugufu8f83 7mo ago
I find the whole thing pretty depressing. They went to all that effort with the organization and setup of the company at the beginning to try to bake this "good for humanity" stuff into its DNA and legal structure and it all compl
29.
by bugufu8f83 9mo ago
>Don’t assume something you cannot prove. Well it's an inherently unprovable accusation, so assumption will have to do. It reeks of LLM-ese in certain word choices, phrases, and structure, though. I thought it was quite clear. >I
30.
by bugufu8f83 9mo ago
>Setting aside...the LLM writing style I don't want to set that aside either. Why is AI generated slop getting voted to the top of HN? If you can't be bothered to spend the time writing a blog post, why should I be bothered spe

More ›