budparr

6 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by budparr 11y ago

   Hook Forms looks good. I'll post it to our tools section at The New Dynamic. Will it always be free, at least for some functionality?
2. 2.▲
   by budparr 11y ago

   Not as simple as Pure, that's for sure. It's separate because if you don't need the grid (neat) then you just don't include it.
3. 3.▲
   by budparr 11y ago

   I've used Jekyll (quite a bit), Metalsmith, and Hugo and tested some others. They all fit a particular use-case, like Hugo is incredibly fast, Metalsmith is incredibly flexible (it's something like a Gulp for static sites), and Je
4. 4.▲
   by budparr 11y ago

   purecss is no longer in development. I've used it and it was a good start, but I've since shifted to using bourbon/neat, which is more a library than a framework and has a light footprint. https://github.com/y
5. 5.▲
   by budparr 11y ago

   Some of the formatting is wonky, here, but you can read the post at the link at the bottom. CONTENT IN Most, but not all, static site generators use markdown files to store content, with information about each file of content specified usin
6. 6.▲
   by budparr 12y ago

   check out http://mixture.io and http://cactusformac.com
7. 7.▲
   by budparr 12y ago

   Looking forward to seeing webhook in action (I backed it). Will there be an open source component (perhaps the way Harp works), or entirely your service? Either way, it looks fantastic!