bsenftner

6 ms·

1.
by bsenftner 4d ago
Okay, so we know OpenAI and Anthropic are operating a propagandists in respect to how they describe their models and the behavior of those models. We also know it is how they use and frame their use to their models that is the problem, that
2.
by bsenftner 4d ago
Okay, so we know OpenAI and Anthropic are operating a propagandists in respect to how they describe their models and the behavior of those models. We also know it is how they use and frame their use to their models that is the problem, that
3.
by bsenftner 8d ago
Ramanujan was a phenomenon
4.
by bsenftner 8d ago
Only the idle and curious rich
5.
by bsenftner 9d ago
The propaganda police are lying. There is nothing wrong with C/C++, you are just too lazy to handle your own memory, and you accepted that propaganda that "managing your own memory is hard" without even trying. The idea that
6.
by bsenftner 12d ago
Well, you proved you have it with your declaration of my statement as "handwavy". That assessment requires comprehension, so you've got it. To "prove" a person has comprehension, if they "learn" without a
7.
by bsenftner 13d ago
Sure: comprehension is the ability to instantaneously create virtualized simulations of observation, and then decompose them into component parts that simultaneously and instantaneously evaluate each and every one of our observations for bo
8.
by bsenftner 13d ago
Comprehension, humans have it, animals have it in limited form, trained algorithms have none at all. The training process is our wholesale replacement for no artificial comprehension. If we ever develop artificial comprehension, that is A
9.
by bsenftner 14d ago
One of my favorite topics, and one that many people argue exists. The conventional thinker really dislikes this concept, as if it points out some personal flaw of theirs. I mention that only because it really sticks out, the personalized pe
10.
by bsenftner 16d ago
That polarizing take is magnified by our failure to teach how to manage discussions that contain controversy and disagreement. Then there is the fact that most people's idea of debate is some game of dominance and not to find solutions
11.
by bsenftner 16d ago
Wow, you really do not understand them. The 'problem' with LLM AI is the weak educations of the people that cannot grasp their subtle multidimensional nature, and how that creates a requirement on the users' behalf to underst
12.
by bsenftner 18d ago
Do you really want a 20 minute pause in the action, every time a new room or space is encountered, because Tolkien goes on for 2-5 pages describing every new environment like that.
13.
by bsenftner 18d ago
Nobody wants to watch such films, they want to muck with the filmmaker, the generation apparatus. That's the product, if there is one here, and absolutely not the 3 hour epic that's spit out with 4 variations to choose between. Th
14.
by bsenftner 18d ago
The results are boring. Not because the content is boring, but because you can so easily remix the results. Human curation is what creates value with these, not dumping and consuming. A personal perspective of a human being ups the respect,
15.
by bsenftner 18d ago
> It's widely reported on and discussed. You'll find plenty of people saying it isn't one, but I'm sure you can find an economist willing to take any position you like if you look hard enough. Not to mention everyone
16.
by bsenftner 19d ago
Then you're talking about fiction. Live in reality. The true issue with reality is not "AI doing all things", not at all. The true issue is it not doing all things and the stupid authorities insisting it does, and forcing the
17.
by bsenftner 21d ago
Worth knowing how he died and more about his life: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marshall_Brain
18.
by bsenftner 21d ago
> Do you believe people will be able to sustain their incomes at current levels if A.I. does most of the work? Does not matter, UBI will make the situation worse. And that "AI does most the work" is yet another fairytale. AI do
19.
by bsenftner 21d ago
Which may as well be a fairy tale, not going to happen ever again. That was an anomaly.
20.
by bsenftner 21d ago
UBI is a farce, and is the wealth class's yet another lever to control people. UBI will not be "universal", not in this human civilization of hyper stratification. Conditions will be placed, and only certain ethnicity, and so
21.
by bsenftner 21d ago
Must use the Internet Archive now: https://web.archive.org/web/20260725174355/https://marshallb... The author died.
22.
by bsenftner 21d ago
This requires critical analysis and secondary considerations to be present, if not well developed, in a critical percentage of the population. That population does not exist, and the entire motion of modern culture over the last 50 years ha
23.
by bsenftner 24d ago
Which means your ability to communicate well becomes paramount. Being weird, being unique does not equate to being unintelligible - but far too many are going to go this way. If "we" want our weird to infect, you need to communica
24.
by bsenftner 24d ago
Terrible advice. If I were 17, genetics and bio tech at the next frontier, with opportunities to be more than another corporate drone. AI is a lot of bureaucracy and nepotistic who ya know already.
25.
by bsenftner 26d ago
Now, what this tells me is that LLM AIs can supply the knowledge of the moment for the prepared human person, and the person does not need to learn that knowledge, for a extremely large class of problems. Which is fantastic for capitalism a
26.
by bsenftner 26d ago
Astute take on current events.
27.
by bsenftner 27d ago
> Perception is the biggest enemy, and it can be changed. This needs to be formally inscribed above every school entrance.
28.
by bsenftner 27d ago
Just start reading PKD and you'll find that Crumb comic to be the "lite" experience.
29.
by bsenftner 27d ago
Oh, and only these two social media sites? Or we're only going to headline echo that it is TikTok? Why does this smell like out of control propaganda?
30.
by bsenftner 29d ago
You can create a patent that builds on other patents. You can make up all kinds of "what if" "inventions" and spend a lot of money acquiring patents for them, if you have the money to do this originally. Then it is a gam

More ›