bryfb

7 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by bryfb 4y ago

   Excellent illustration. Thank you.
2. 2.▲
   by bryfb 4y ago

   I think the wording in the FDIC order was that customers were "initiating 42bn of withdrawals."[0] Doesn't mean those went through (in fact many from what I heard didn't.) Still certainly very possible that the analysis
3. 3.▲
   by bryfb 4y ago

   "The yield they wanted to see on this capital" I imagine is some combination of money needed to run operations of the bank, interest paid on the deposits and profit. They could have just stored the money in the proverbial vault. B
4. 4.▲
   by bryfb 4y ago

   A $100 in 10 years is just not worth $100 today in the current interest rate environment.
5. 5.▲
   by bryfb 4y ago

   I thought the follwoing was an interesting analysis: Aside from the fact that those assets don't seem to be valued at the current price (i.e. are marked at cost basis, not market,) much of it is already pledged as collateral. https:&#
6. 6.▲
   by bryfb 4y ago

   FDIC is funded by premiums from participating banks. Beyond the insured limit, there isn't really a guarantee that the "lost money will come back."
7. 7.▲
   by bryfb 4y ago

   I certainly wouldn't choose LastPass over 1Password, but given 1Password is deprecating local storage I wouldn't recommend 1Password anymore either.
8. 8.▲
   by bryfb 4y ago

   Is passkeys just a webauthn implementation? https://webauthn.io is a similar demo I think.
9. 9.▲
   by bryfb 4y ago

   Eventually, and given this funding that time may be now in fact, they'll just build an on-prem version that will probably be wildly expensive. In that sense it has the same security considerations as other SaaS products.
10. 10.▲
    by bryfb 4y ago

    I'm so tired of this FUD cloudflare throws around. So far, I don't see a single cloudflare product that solves the purported problem without introducing three others that they conveniently don't talk about. And when the inevi