bryant

7 ms·

1.
by bryant 23d ago
Two just this year, CVE-2026-66747 and CVE-2026-11405.
2.
by bryant 1mo ago
> It did cure some people Cure has a very specific definition. I don't think it applies here.
3.
by bryant 2mo ago
> I'll take the bet that you're totally wrong. Good news is, this is one of the niche areas where prediction markets make sense. I wouldn't mind seeing a few predictions around this acquisition and the longer term outcomes
4.
by bryant 2mo ago
They're in a position to get their own TLD (e.g .tgrm - edited from .tg); they should probably do this and run their own supporting infrastructure for it at this point.
5.
by bryant 2mo ago
Die Another Day (2003) has a more ridiculous take on the same idea.
6.
by bryant 3mo ago
TL;DR: I think while Sullivan did add context, much of the context could've been "decompression" in an almost technical sense. This would've made Helen's exact words more palatable for the world to consume, and Sull
7.
by bryant 4mo ago
Citation for #1 - https://harvardlawreview.org/blog/2026/03/united-states-v-he... > Judge Rakoff of the Southern District of New York — addressing “a question of first impression nationwide” — ruled that w
8.
by bryant 5mo ago
On a related note, I wonder if an LLM harnessed with this would fall for some of the same phishing scams humans fall for.
9.
by bryant 5mo ago
> why does it have to be suspicious. Its a services offering that we have. It's difficult to read good intent in the original comment when the text of the comment says "these guys" as if the account (your account) is endor
10.
by bryant 6mo ago
More batteries, more likely that you'll have even just one of them fail. Since even one of them (to your point) failing is enough of a reason to divert the flight, better to start by reducing the probability of that happening in ways p
11.
by bryant 6mo ago
Public companies are incentivized to fire for short term gains while figuring out long term strategy on the basis that they'll have a cheaper pool to hire from once they figure out how they're going to more effectively monetize th
12.
by bryant 7mo ago
Much more interesting would be if the tariffs were refunded equally to each person nationwide (interesting in that it very clearly then becomes an income redistribution scheme, even if on a limited basis). Possibly a refund of about $500 pe
13.
by bryant 7mo ago
> The moral disposition of the Anthropic leaders doesn't matter because they don't own the company. Investors won't idly watch them decimate billions in ROI by alienating the largest institutional customers on the planet.
14.
by bryant 7mo ago
> because the Chinese government probably isn't going to do anything about whatever they find out. This really depends. If a foreign adversary's surveillance finds you have a particular weakness exploitable for corporate or gov
15.
by bryant 7mo ago
The returns on [1] seem to be worse than CDs, and with no government insurance, so it's not worth it at the current payout. But if a religious event spikes the odds, it'll be worth taking the other side of this bet.
16.
by bryant 7mo ago
> They would rather destroy it than sell it at $300. This is exactly it. The actual landed cost is 1/10th of the sales price, and most of the rest of the margin pads the marketing and exclusivity machine. If for instance LV starts s
17.
by bryant 7mo ago
> Seems bizarre. It's not like companies didn't want to sell it--they'd prefer to have the revenue. This is just kicking them then while they're down. I wonder if it will reduce risk-taking since it increases the down
18.
by bryant 7mo ago
I mean, framed differently: > A material number of customers see Animate as a differentiator from our competitors, so even if we only provide support and security patches, the investment is justified for retention. I don't really th
19.
by bryant 8mo ago
Before your edit: The world wide web: https://home.cern/science/computing/birth-web certain medical imaging: https://home.cern/news/news/knowledge-sharing/medipix-partic... grid com
20.
by bryant 8mo ago
I get the emotion behind this comment (and the previous one you deleted), but putting leadership credit where it's due, 99.999% of the operational and strategic leadership at SpaceX is Gwynne Shotwell's. She's essentially the
21.
by bryant 8mo ago
Concur, I've had Promotions land in my Primary inbox for at least a few hours.
22.
by bryant 8mo ago
> The study tracked pupils’ self-reported social media habits, gaming frequency and emotional difficulties over three school years This study is dead in the water. Teens have zero near-term incentives to be honest about any of these even
23.
by bryant 8mo ago
Since this is a special publication and since it was published in 1977 (after the Privacy Act of 1974), I'm wondering if NASA's condition for astronauts on this mission was to release mission-related medical science to the public.
24.
by bryant 8mo ago
> Why be so secretive? This is not a military mission. These missions cost a lot of taxpayer money (money well spend you may argue), but we deserve full transparency. We deserve as much transparency as we can get on the science we as tax
25.
by bryant 8mo ago
In fairness to flock, they just hired a CISO and are actively recruiting for a head of product security and privacy as well. So I'm not surprised they're dealing with some of this. Edit: I'm standing by it. The person they hi
26.
by bryant 9mo ago
I miss RSS.
27.
by bryant 11mo ago
"better to reign in hell than to serve in heaven" is the expression and idea you're looking for. Alternatively "better to rule among the miserable than to serve among the great." It's a consistent theme with mo
28.
by bryant 11mo ago
> Apparently there is still a large stock of "hot" building material that are sitting in warehouses and every once in a while they make it into the supply chain. I wonder how much of this is because folks in the supply chain mi
29.
by bryant 11mo ago
For those who don't intuitively think in base 2, 2¹⁹ bytes, or 512KiB.
30.
by bryant 11mo ago
Yeah fair enough. lol

More ›