bruhmanfiflo

5 ms·

1.
by bruhmanfiflo 2y ago
...but what if you did? man wouldn't that be something??!!
2.
by bruhmanfiflo 2y ago
"tied back to your real life identity" my name and google work together my friend...
3.
by bruhmanfiflo 2y ago
Would really appreciate that, thanks!
4.
by bruhmanfiflo 2y ago
If I do well no one buys me
5.
by bruhmanfiflo 2y ago
I agree. Now there's just searching for ideas on how to do that
6.
by bruhmanfiflo 2y ago
No I wasn't familiar with brushing, I'll have to look into it. When you say powers that be, that's basically the community, I mentioned mods but I don't think it should be "policed" or moderated by some upper l
7.
by bruhmanfiflo 2y ago
I hear your concerns and absolutely understand them, however I think you're missing the point that this isn't about surveillance or control - it's helping people make more informed choices about who they interact with, while
8.
by bruhmanfiflo 2y ago
foundationally it's similar, where it differs is the SCS is government controlled and focuses on surveillance and control through denying access to travel, jobs, and services, a Trust Score system would be a public self governing syste
9.
by bruhmanfiflo 2y ago
The second chance here is the ability to gain feedback on a bad action and improve it. There is always room for and chances to improve ones self. I would never create a system that placed a negative on someone's entire life. And even t
10.
by bruhmanfiflo 2y ago
This system wouldn't enable tinder or cuddle style interactions only a ratings system. I guess it could be possible that people start using it for prostis and start using coded language to rate those types of interactions, something to
11.
by bruhmanfiflo 2y ago
I found this video interview of the founder of the Peeple app. What stands out is how badly she wants it to be a "positive" app, pretty much hiding and doing away with any type of negative ratings or negativity. But if everybody i
12.
by bruhmanfiflo 2y ago
This seems to be most peoples take on it, not to mention China actually did the thing and made the episode real life. le sigh
13.
by bruhmanfiflo 2y ago
a few idea's for safeguards are first tying someone's account to their actual identity meaning one account per person. This could prevent anonymous ratings, harassment, and swarming behavior Tying ratings to actual meetings or ver
14.
by bruhmanfiflo 2y ago
Makes since why you would be, especially when looking at "prior art" you can see where the focus was. Basic rating, in order for something like this to work i needs to be fairly robust and thought through. Especially considering t
15.
by bruhmanfiflo 2y ago
hmm, that's a good point. I've seen doordashers using a girlfriends/boyfriends account and I always think to myself, "they must have gotten THEIR account banned"
16.
by bruhmanfiflo 2y ago
I've noticed this. People tend to be fine with and even invite these scoring systems in isolation but as a whole people cringe. If it's good to know if an uber driver or door dasher is good at their job, why is it bad to know if s
17.
Social Trust Score
4 points by bruhmanfiflo 2y ago|37 comments