brooksgarrett

7 ms·

1.
by brooksgarrett 6y ago
I'll second you. I full time admin our K8s infrastructure and clusters. It's a great solution for our production workloads and I've bootstrapped RancherOS/k3s a handful of times to look at using it at home but K8s is pur
2.
by brooksgarrett 7y ago
Necrosoft.
3.
by brooksgarrett 7y ago
Except we will never actually know... 73 DE WP3NIS
4.
by brooksgarrett 7y ago
I went back and rewatched it. I completely forgot they forced it. I first saw this a couple months ago when our TC used it for extrication refresher. I have to admit, even though it is staged and the car is completely intact, watching those
5.
by brooksgarrett 7y ago
We don't. It's a cool video for a training night but really it's a pretty standard dash roll. Electric cars present a very real danger but so do ICE. High pressure fuel lines with pumps that don't shut down. Diesel engin
6.
by brooksgarrett 7y ago
I'm not sure what ram speed has to do at all with extrication. The biggest problem area I see with the model 3 is the fact that a large portion of the high voltage carriers are centerline on the vehicle. In our department using the cen
7.
by brooksgarrett 7y ago
I'm willing to bet my Hurst spreaders will get the frunk open sans battery. If you're cutting the car, it's already totaled and limiting damage to the frunk would be the last concern on my mind.
8.
by brooksgarrett 7y ago
No. The internet is in a box and Jenn broke it.
9.
by brooksgarrett 7y ago
In one, you intentionally give false information and lead the government believe you in good faith complied. In the other, the data is inaccessible and the government is aware it is inaccessible. They can then evaluate risk and seize the de
10.
by brooksgarrett 7y ago
I took a workshop on custom Kali builds where they specifically spoke about LUKS headers and shipping them via email/gdrive to yourself and removing them from the physical device. It renders the partition useless. This was viewed as a
11.
by brooksgarrett 7y ago
Not data but a strong anecdote to support your assertion: https://www.forbes.com/sites/jasonevangelho/2019/04/08/linux...
12.
by brooksgarrett 8y ago
Here is an AWS developer discussion that details their response: https://forums.aws.amazon.com/message.jspa?messageID=851817#... Quote for those without access: There is a known bug with Route 53 DNS servers in which we are
13.
by brooksgarrett 8y ago
Firefighter for over 10 years and an IT career spanning Red Team/Blue Team and now SRE, I can't recommend enough taking the FEMA Independent Study course in Incident Command. https://training.fema.gov/is/cours
14.
by brooksgarrett 9y ago
I agree. I've never been on a fireground and had someone yell, "We lost the house because you didn't divide by 12!" Fireground math is a very rough science. Every engine in our district has pre calculated charts for ever
15.
by brooksgarrett 9y ago
If you have fire based EMS then that will account for the vast majority of your call volume, full stop. Accidents requiring extrication are rapidly decreasing as cars are becoming safer. Additionally, homes are becoming drastically less at
16.
by brooksgarrett 9y ago
Speaking from experience, it's primarily due to 'tradition.' All of your combi-nozzles and rate control valves are rated and marked in GPM (Gallons per minute) and hose is purchased and stored as 50' sections. NFPA speci
17.
by brooksgarrett 11y ago
I think that is a compelling narrative. I truly hope this takes off. I know several attorneys and other small shops that would value such a time saving service. The only major barrier is still getting them to design and publish the content.
18.
by brooksgarrett 11y ago
After more reading you offer significantly more value than a pure static site with custom redirects and API passthrough. I just wonder about differentiating from CloudFlare.
19.
by brooksgarrett 11y ago
How is this different from GitHub hosted source(Free), compiled by TravisCI (Free), hosted in S3($15/year), secured byand fronted by CloudFlare (Free). This is my setup (minus CloudFlare for CDN). http://brooksgarrett.com&#x
20.
by brooksgarrett 12y ago
The biggest problem with this question is the breadth of the term 'hacker'. Hackers tend to clump into whatever projects they are currently working on. Try starting off in places like #ubuntu and other projects (that interest you!
21.
by brooksgarrett 13y ago
I think you've missed the point. Ultimately, moving the port isn't securing the service but is just one more layer. It won't hold against a focused attacker but will hold against a majority of casual scanners just looking for
22.
by brooksgarrett 13y ago
The absolute best way to know that is to know the public host key and verify your keys. Additionally, you don't have to resort to high ports to achieve a best of breed. Just !=22 is enough to avoid majority of skiddies.