Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
broeng
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
9 ms
·
1.
▲
by
broeng
2mo ago
Maybe it was just using Google Search, and not finding anything ...
2.
▲
by
broeng
2mo ago
I wont quite argue, that 1080p is always enough on a 75", but your example is more a Netflix problem; their compression results in hideous quality, and it's not really representative of what 1080p could be.
3.
▲
by
broeng
2mo ago
And olive trees have genders, with the male pollinating the surrounding females.
4.
▲
by
broeng
5mo ago
I think Denmark is in the same situation, and recently gave a timeline of 10 years for new projects to get connected to the grid.
5.
▲
by
broeng
10mo ago
I don't think any of the national id services I've heard of stores all your data in a centralized place. Usually the national id service only provides identification to the service providers that request it. Each service provider
6.
▲
by
broeng
10mo ago
Compared to the Java ecosystem, I think there's a couple of issues in the NPM ecosystem that makes the situation a lot worse: 1) The availability of the package post-install hook that can run any command after simply resolving and down
7.
▲
by
broeng
11mo ago
I haven't looked into it much, but I assume the point is that it avoids the SWIFT system.
8.
▲
by
broeng
1y ago
At least here in Denmark, they seem to have opted for installing bigger "pipes", instead of just laying down some fiber cables. Then in the future they can just push new cables through the pipes. An idea I bet they wish they had g
9.
▲
by
broeng
1y ago
What do you mean? They can be in a single service file.
10.
▲
by
broeng
1y ago
The Senna series from 2024 is also pretty good.
11.
▲
by
broeng
1y ago
It's been possible to use Content Blockers for Safari for a long time, which alters the page content. Firefox Focus came out about a decade ago, and can be used as one.
12.
▲
by
broeng
1y ago
It's been possible for about a decade to use Firefox Focus as a Content Blocker for Safari. I assume it's open source, "well trusted" is of course subjective.
13.
▲
by
broeng
1y ago
And earlier than that, they jumped on the train.
14.
▲
by
broeng
2y ago
anal_reactor says so.
15.
▲
by
broeng
2y ago
No, not for a connector for 500W, on a $2000 GPU from one of the worlds biggest companies. They can do better.
16.
▲
by
broeng
2y ago
I'm not debating that. I'm pointing out, that the person replied to, said there's no reason to mix it together with the artifact dependencies. In other words, no need to mix "dependencies" and "dev dependenci
17.
▲
by
broeng
2y ago
Tbh, I think you missed this part: "[..] mixed with artefact dependencies itself".
18.
▲
by
broeng
2y ago
Maybe that section of highway could easily be cleared in time with a warning system, like when we warn for crossing trains. A wall doesn't have to be the only solution.
19.
▲
by
broeng
2y ago
My modern dishwasher is also very kind, and displays the time to end in minutes throughout the wash. Counting down from an hour. But I don't know what kind of upbringing it had, for some reason, the sneaky bastard always adds another 2
20.
▲
by
broeng
2y ago
It seems like a bad design choice, that, besides allowing for running untrusted code directly at download time, also makes it difficult to properly mirror artifacts, and I'd assume, make platform portability inconsistent, at best.
21.
▲
by
broeng
2y ago
I'm pretty sure that's incorrect. One portion of the build-to-host buildfile was only present in the release tarball. https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/03/29/4
22.
▲
by
broeng
2y ago
I don't really think thats more obvious. It's expected to install dev libraries, not system services, it shouldn't have that need.
23.
▲
by
broeng
2y ago
Why the hell does npm support a postinstall script? There really shouldn't be a need to run arbitrary code provided by the package for something like this.
24.
▲
by
broeng
2y ago
The xz backdoor was an example of exploiting this disconnect. It was not present in the repository, it was inserted only into the release artifacts. Anyone getting xz by checking out the repository and building it themselves, would not be a
25.
▲
by
broeng
2y ago
I have a toddler, and that has changed my view on it a bit, from the same starting point you are expressing. With the social pressure going on, I expect she'll get a smartphone earlier that I'd honestly prefer (not that we are the
26.
▲
by
broeng
3y ago
Fair enough, I'll admit I missed that completely.
27.
▲
by
broeng
3y ago
According to you, when does a child earn their own share of sunlight, so their parents are not "overusing" their share? Is it at a certain age, or is that only for children born latest at $YOUR_BIRTHYEAR?
28.
▲
by
broeng
3y ago
I think you might have hit the moo^Wnail on the head.
29.
▲
by
broeng
3y ago
Maybe we can agree they are still _mostly_ at gateway. But their ambition to answer your question through zero-clicks (i.e., show the answer right in their search results) does make them profit from direct copying. The copyright owner will
30.
▲
by
broeng
3y ago
I knew it.
More ›