Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
breadsniffer
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
9 ms
·
1.
▲
by
breadsniffer
3mo ago
Why do I feel like this is the story of the average B2B SaaS YC startup?
2.
▲
by
breadsniffer
3mo ago
I’m paying $100 per month for codex, idk if that’s them “losing”….? Although idk about big enterprise cos keeping their unlimited token/tokenmaxxin usage though API req
3.
▲
by
breadsniffer
3mo ago
Turn this into an essay or something, cool ideas here
4.
▲
by
breadsniffer
3mo ago
+1
5.
▲
by
breadsniffer
4mo ago
They’re so disconnected from reality, living in their own bubble.
6.
▲
by
breadsniffer
4mo ago
gottem!!! Bad bot
7.
▲
by
breadsniffer
4mo ago
from perplexity deep research: "Colossus‑related gas‑turbine power plants have been run in ways alleged to violate the Clean Air Act, in already over‑polluted Black and low‑income communities near Memphis, and Anthropic has now become
8.
▲
by
breadsniffer
5mo ago
Yeah very simple, but cool nonetheless.
9.
▲
by
breadsniffer
6mo ago
Mamboooo no. #5
10.
▲
by
breadsniffer
6mo ago
Anyone know what kind of departments/parts of business were the first adopters of visicalc?
11.
▲
by
breadsniffer
7mo ago
Facts
12.
▲
by
breadsniffer
9mo ago
can you expand on your workflow?
13.
▲
by
breadsniffer
11mo ago
2027
14.
▲
by
breadsniffer
11mo ago
I took inspiration from ( https://www.dol.gov/newsroom/releases/osec/osec20250812 ), which mentions: "Demand-Driven Strategies: Expand proven work-based learning models like Registered Apprenticeships and
15.
▲
by
breadsniffer
11mo ago
Thank you for the kind words!
16.
▲
Show HN: Simulation of the Tech Industry in 2027
(marbleos.com)
8 points
by
breadsniffer
11mo ago
|
9 comments
17.
▲
OpenAI's H1 2025: $4.3B in income, $13.5B in loss
(techinasia.com)
558 points
by
breadsniffer
1y ago
|
697 comments
18.
▲
by
breadsniffer
1y ago
Yup! People here are great hackers but it’s almost like they have their head up their own ass when it comes to AI/ML. Most of HN was very wrong about LLMs.
19.
▲
by
breadsniffer
1y ago
Let me guess, you’ve never tried them? This is the one substance no one should be talking about if you’ve never tried it. You can’t reason your way through it with first principles.
20.
▲
by
breadsniffer
2y ago
I like this. It seems that those who value agency don’t align with the post. It validates letting time go by without doing anything to change yourself or the situation.
21.
▲
by
breadsniffer
2y ago
Image to go along with Hokusai's beautiful bit: https://i.imgur.com/Q6khyva.png
22.
▲
by
breadsniffer
2y ago
I love this mindset. I don’t buy the other perspectives. When you fall in love with the craft… time, perception, age, etc matter much less. You care more about adapting yourself no matter how old to perfect the craft.
23.
▲
by
breadsniffer
2y ago
Wow. That’s insane! With the trick I can somehow solve them all!
24.
▲
by
breadsniffer
2y ago
I tried it, and it's good but I feel like the synthetic data used for training 3.1 does not hold up to gpt4o prob using human-curated data.
25.
▲
by
breadsniffer
2y ago
Interesting. How many companies need people to build things from the ground up vs maintainers/janitors of complex systems? I think the type of interview (leetcode vs system design) might depend on what category the job fits into.
26.
▲
by
breadsniffer
2y ago
Here's an AI system that applies the pedagogy of George Polya: https://www.withmarble.io/ It helps learners understand, plan, and then implement the plan.
27.
▲
by
breadsniffer
2y ago
This is basically the idea behind https://www.synthesis.com/tutor
28.
▲
by
breadsniffer
2y ago
New windows PCs will come equipped with a co-pilot that can see everything on the screen. I wonder if this vision Andy laid out is more like a ChatGPT co-pilot that has all context of your screen/life, rather than a "learning tool
29.
▲
by
breadsniffer
2y ago
There's still the cost of reviewing bad code. If the task was "completed" but you have to spend 20 mins looking over the code or the whole 1-hour-long process to "understand" what it did, it still failed.
30.
▲
by
breadsniffer
3y ago
They're 100% shooting for being able to fire most engineers. That's the dream that allows raising a bunch of $$$. Just know there's a reason their product is a closed demo. Any working "agent" will require intervent
More ›