bradrydzewski

6 ms·

1.
by bradrydzewski 3y ago
Gitness actually launched in 2012 under the name Drone, with a focus on continuous integration. So Gitness has a very strong, mature pipeline engine that is also very popular in the Gogs and Gitea community (Gitness is backward compatible w
2.
by bradrydzewski 3y ago
It is largely based on the existing Drone repository, but for Git capabilities we used the Gitea fork of https://github.com/gogs/git-module
3.
by bradrydzewski 3y ago
Yes. Dark mode is coming. Code Snippet management is a great suggestion and we will absolutely pick this up. Thanks for testing it out. Hit us up in our Slack channel if you have any future suggestions or if there is anything we can do to h
4.
by bradrydzewski 3y ago
Very possible. SourceHut is great and seems to be most popular with developers and open source teams (although I'm sure they also have corporate users too). We are more focused on companies and enterprises. These are different segments
5.
by bradrydzewski 3y ago
I see Gitness as the evolution of Drone. We are using the Drone pipeline engine and a ton of Drone code under the hood, but we are also adding Code hosting capabilities. And at some point, when you upgrade to the next major version of Drone
6.
by bradrydzewski 3y ago
Nothing cynical about that statement. We definitely want to preserve the star counts! But as the founder of Drone, and Head of Product for Gitness, I see Gitness as the next major version of Drone. Gitness is built on the Drone pipeline eng
7.
by bradrydzewski 3y ago
I run the Gitness Project at Harness (also Founded Drone, on which this is based). It was mentioned by another Harness employee, but we have been dogfooding Gitness internally for the past 6 months. The project is entirely self-hosted at th
8.
by bradrydzewski 3y ago
It is a portmanteau of Git and Harness
9.
by bradrydzewski 3y ago
This is probably my fault. Internally at Harness I have been hyping this launch as a "once in a decade" event. That unfortunately got translated into "first in a decade" when it hit the press. I do think the launch of a
10.
by bradrydzewski 4y ago
I think this is a matter of perspective. I founded a company that sold b2b software and experimented with removing pricing from my website. The challenge is the cost to complete each sale was highly variable which made it difficult to adver
11.
by bradrydzewski 4y ago
while on the topic of business focus, is Brex still in the restaurant business? https://www.sfchronicle.com/food/article/Multibillion-dollar...
12.
by bradrydzewski 4y ago
The purpose of this software is to allow remote management of sqlite databases using existing postgres GUI tools. > Postlite is a network proxy to allow access to remote SQLite databases over the Postgres wire protocol. This allows GUI t
13.
by bradrydzewski 6y ago
I believe copyright law in the U.S. is governed by federal statute and copyright infringement matters would be handled by a federal court.
14.
by bradrydzewski 6y ago
Kyle is one of the authors of Polyform and the Polyform website specifically states that these licenses are not Open Source. > PolyForm is not Open source or free software. There are plenty of existing open source licenses. PolyForm is
15.
by bradrydzewski 7y ago
Drone supports many different target runtimes, including running pipelines directly on the host similar to Jenkins. See https://docs.drone.io/installation/runners/
16.
by bradrydzewski 7y ago
One-sided would imply that only one party benefits. You clearly benefit from being able to use and improve software, for free, for practically any purpose.
17.
by bradrydzewski 7y ago
I respectfully disagree with the suggestion that this is immoral. Sentry is granting you a license, for free, to do anything you want with the software except provide a commercial competitor to their hosted service. People using the softwar
18.
by bradrydzewski 7y ago
I have been using and contributing and publishing open source software (and source available software) since 2004. The first time I heard of the OSI and OSD was in 2017. For years I thought open source simply meant the source code was publi
19.
by bradrydzewski 7y ago
You might find it interesting that Stallman supports selling exceptions to the GPL (i.e. dual licensing). You can read more about it on the FSF blog [1] but the post ends with the following: > I consider selling exceptions an acceptable
20.
by bradrydzewski 7y ago
I recommend taking a look at the API Copyleft License https://github.com/kemitchell/api-copyleft-license/blob/mast...
21.
by bradrydzewski 7y ago
Yes, it supports windows, macos, and linux. I expect it will also support bsd although I have not tested this yet. This should land in master some time this week.
22.
by bradrydzewski 7y ago
Tekton [1] works in a similar manner where the pipeline stages define inputs, outputs and tasks. The great part about Tekton is it provides a set of building blocks that can be integrated into a larger system. I hope to integrate Tekton int
23.
by bradrydzewski 7y ago
> It only works with Docker containers This will only be true for another week or two. We have devised a framework for alternate runtimes, including running pipelines directly on the host machine or in traditional virtual machines, that
24.
by bradrydzewski 7y ago
There was an interesting community-driven project to create a dashboard for Drone, see https://github.com/drone/drone-wall . I would love to see more like it.
25.
by bradrydzewski 7y ago
Drone is working on support for Starlark, a python-inspired configuration language used by the Bazel Build system [1]. For complex pipelines, this should be more analogous to Jenkins scripting and may improve scaling Drone for larger projec
26.
by bradrydzewski 8y ago
If you are building everything on the same machine you could get rid of the registry and watchtower, mount the host machine docker socket into your pipeline, and build and start the image on the host machine from inside your pipeline. I use
27.
The Blue Oak Model License, a new state-of-the-art permissive license(blueoakcouncil.org)
1 points by bradrydzewski 8y ago|0 comments
28.
by bradrydzewski 8y ago
thanks for the response. I will add my name to the waitlist and look forward to discussing at a future date.
29.
by bradrydzewski 8y ago
I really like the idea, and appreciate that there are people out there trying to solve this problem! I have struggled to financially support my open source projects through donations and support contracts, and ultimately decided on an open
30.
by bradrydzewski 8y ago
Have you considered submitting for OSI approval?

More ›