bornonmars

6 ms·

1.
by bornonmars 13y ago
Wait a second, we need a revolution ? We all agree on the negative effects of those externalities, but pricing them in before completing the transition to sustainable systems would only make resources MUCH less affordable for the end-consu
2.
by bornonmars 13y ago
Okay, here's a thing - how about developing a more accurate risk profile assessment and pricing structure than any other broker out there (just like some lending platforms doubled the accuracy in evaluating credit ratings in comparison to l
3.
by bornonmars 13y ago
The cool thing about real estate agents (unlike attorneys) is that the great ones charge just as much as the bad ones. Takeaway? Mainly just reinforcing the fact that this market is still immensely inefficient.
4.
by bornonmars 13y ago
I don't agree. They already focus on upside risk, the main fear being to miss out. There's no bias left, at least not there.
5.
by bornonmars 13y ago
Ok. There's the attraction that Spotify might have had for that kind of market, along with some synergies in its structure i.e. 1) major shift within an old & monopolistic industry being left behind by new technologies and 2) similariti
6.
by bornonmars 14y ago
Never said it's dying down, on the contrary - the supply of such skills will eventually have to be much more common given strong demand. The new uncommon will be something else though.
7.
by bornonmars 14y ago
"But if I had to do it over again today, I might choose bio-informatics or nanotechnology.” In 20 years from now, IT skills will better be more than common. The internet will be in a post-maturity stage. The new "lack of" won't be of CS fol
8.
by bornonmars 14y ago
Robo-pet anyone? Disruption of the nannies' market.
9.
by bornonmars 14y ago
Yes, but I wouldn't even go so far as to cite the 100% new market creation - where's the usual timing / major shift argument? If that actually applies for real, forget the fallacy. In all other cases, feel free to keep it in mind.
10.
by bornonmars 14y ago
b2c: depending on your users, you may even prefer .co to .com - esp. if you target users like me. b2b: generally careful here - except if you target startups like ours. So yeh, directly correlated to your target being tech savvy or not I'd
11.
by bornonmars 14y ago
Points 1. and 11. thumbs up! Not agreeing with 7. though, cause framed that way it actually ends up being that fluff you wanna avoid
12.
by bornonmars 14y ago
Quantum internet is "starting to become feasible"? It will be in their daily lives so much faster than that.
13.
by bornonmars 14y ago
Did you look at what's really driving the value of Bitcoin? Fine, the price will readjust, but you should forget most classic financial analysis tools atm. That said, I'm building a new little model justforfun to predict the price through