boklm

4 ms·

1.
by boklm 11y ago
From what I see, shout-irc does not allow you to stay connected on IRC channels when you are offline or close your browser.
2.
by boklm 11y ago
You can try the following workaround: https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/17453#commen...
3.
by boklm 11y ago
This link has already been posted: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10107833
4.
by boklm 11y ago
No, journald has its own benefits. Creating an alternative to some software doesn't mean you have ill will towards it.
5.
by boklm 11y ago
systemd is 100% free software, unlink Windows. systemd has a command line interface unlike most Windows tools. And I don't know what is the Windows init system but I doubt it is similar to systemd. It's probably much closer to the
6.
by boklm 12y ago
An article in Spanish: http://www.eldiario.es/turing/vigilancia_y_privacidad/dispos...
7.
by boklm 12y ago
An other article, this one in spanish: http://www.eldiario.es/turing/vigilancia_y_privacidad/dispos...
8.
by boklm 12y ago
Correction on the title: this activist is a girl, so it should say "on on her car", not his.
9.
by boklm 12y ago
Because the clients need to get the list of nodes from somewhere. You can read more about how this works at this URL: https://gitweb.torproject.org/torspec.git/tree/dir-spec.txt
10.
by boklm 12y ago
This exit node is now flagged as BadExit: https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/8361A794DFA231D863E109...
11.
An exploration of Tor pluggable transports – how they look on the wire(trac.torproject.org)
65 points by boklm 12y ago|3 comments
12.
by boklm 12y ago
> Blaming the VCS that much is a bunch of lazy excuses. I'm not blaming CVS as an excuse, because as I said, I didn't plan to review it anyway. > No it doesn't make code review difficult. It does make code review diffic
13.
by boklm 12y ago
> I somehow can't imagine an organization named "Linux Foundation" to give money to OpenBSD and other non-Linux related open source projects. Why not ? I could imagine them giving money to OpenSSH developers at least, seei
14.
by boklm 12y ago
> Basically, I don't see any reason to question their use of CVS. Why not ? With CVS, the security rely on the security of a single server. Anybody with root access to the CVS server can modify history, and nobody would notice.
15.
by boklm 12y ago
There's many problems that makes it very annoying to review their changes: - CVS commits are per file. You can't see changes made by a single commit to multiple files. - CVS cannot rename files. You have to create a new file and r
16.
by boklm 12y ago
Because people might be interested to review their changes, and CVS makes that very difficult.
17.
by boklm 12y ago
It's not telling. Whether what you say is true or not, in either case it would be risky to attach your name to something like this.
18.
by boklm 12y ago
It's used for more than git-svn: git-add--interactive.perl git-cvsexportcommit.perl git-cvsserver.perl git-relink.perl git-svn.perl git-archimport.perl git-cvsimport.perl git-difftool.perl git-send-email.perl Th
19.
by boklm 13y ago
About Tor in china: https://blog.torproject.org/blog/how-to-read-our-china-usage...
20.
by boklm 13y ago
> Messages are encrypted using AES and BLOWFISH ciphers on the way into the database. Using a key that is stored in the same database ? How is that useful ? > IPs and logs aren't stored. Except when they decide they want to keep