bogdanoff_2

9 ms·

1.
by bogdanoff_2 15d ago
So the issue really isn't "social media", it's the blackbox personalized algorithmic feed. So that is what we should be addressing. Things like -> no personalized algorithmic feed for minors. The ability to disable al
2.
by bogdanoff_2 17d ago
I'm curious, what programming language and model/harness do you use, and are there some specific practices that you use?
3.
by bogdanoff_2 17d ago
This makes me think of "we're all just temporarily abled". This proves the point -- sometimes we're just typing on our phone, lol
4.
by bogdanoff_2 18d ago
I could imagine (in a commercial organization) a case for something like: "we're obviously going to be relying more and more on AI, so if bad code comes out of it, instead of just shaming the engineer, let's study together w
5.
by bogdanoff_2 20d ago
Saying "the language of LLMs", while technically correct, is not exactly precise. It should really be the language of "AI agents", or "chatbots". OG LLMs would just mimic the style of its context based off of (
6.
by bogdanoff_2 20d ago
To all the people in the HN comments saying negative things about Claude: why don't you just use other models instead?
7.
by bogdanoff_2 22d ago
Like what?
8.
by bogdanoff_2 23d ago
Is that the experience you had? What if you ask it questions about the codebase? I find AI agents really great for codebase exploration and understanding how it works. In some ways even moreso than from manual implementation since it's
9.
by bogdanoff_2 23d ago
That's why you first ask the LLM: "tell me how you would do this, and ask me any clarifications and questions you may have, and share any other thoughts you may have. Don't implement yet." The LLM will look through the
10.
by bogdanoff_2 26d ago
I think the reason is that no one (who has the correct leverage / area of ownership / authority) cares. Big companies have processes for deciding what gets done and which features are prioritized, and if the people in that loop ar
11.
by bogdanoff_2 26d ago
I enjoyed the other posts/art/poetry on the website
12.
by bogdanoff_2 26d ago
A better verb would be "Discard"
13.
by bogdanoff_2 26d ago
> There's a reason the US has a literacy crisis despite billions spent, access to tech and decades of research into how to introduce the mechanics of learning to read (phonics). I thought that the reason the US had a literacy crisis
14.
by bogdanoff_2 1mo ago
I think I know a few things about thinking, types, and testing, but pretty much nothing about telemetry. What are some good resources about telemetry? (Also... I thought there were more comments here on this article? What happened? was it s
15.
by bogdanoff_2 1mo ago
> Once you've toiled on the learning curve of Lisp long enough to really grok it you might begin to think you've discovered the foundational bedrock of the universe. Could it be a form of self-selection bias? That the kind of p
16.
by bogdanoff_2 2mo ago
Well... Yes. If you start including templates in it it definitely is
17.
by bogdanoff_2 2mo ago
Is that different from how companies are reliant on cloud computing?
18.
by bogdanoff_2 2mo ago
You can count down to zero with while(i--)
19.
by bogdanoff_2 3mo ago
Just because something is written in Rust, doesn't mean it's good Rust. I have noticed, in general, LLMs tend to "fix" problems by shoving them under the rug (like adding a cast) or writing a super-local "fix"
20.
by bogdanoff_2 3mo ago
If we go along with the though that our own subjective experience is the only thing we truly know, and that we cannot really know if any other humans are having the same experience (and any belief of that sorts is purely extrapolation), the
21.
by bogdanoff_2 4mo ago
I'm starting to agree with you; I found the plan/develop/review workflow to work quite well, but I'm not at the point of not looking at the code at all yet. I guess you actually review and actively participate in making
22.
by bogdanoff_2 4mo ago
How is that not the same thing?
23.
by bogdanoff_2 6mo ago
What do you mean by "actually governing the agents at the system level", and how is it different from "herding cats"?
24.
by bogdanoff_2 6mo ago
> Should I also co-author my PRs with my linter, intellisense and IDE? Kinda, yeah. If I automatically apply lint suggestions, I would title my commit "apply lint suggestions".
25.
by bogdanoff_2 6mo ago
There's a difference between addictiveness and enjoyment, and definitely between addictiveness and satisfaction. While the thing that gives you quick dopamine might win in the very short term, you can still step back and recognize when
26.
by bogdanoff_2 6mo ago
>Isn't anyone strong enough to choose a less addictive algorithm necessarily strong enough to not scroll Instagram for hours in the first place? Absolutely not. It's much easier to make a one-time switch than to be continuously
27.
by bogdanoff_2 6mo ago
addictiveness != enjoyment Although to some extent they're correlated, sometimes the things that are most enjoyable you wouldn't describe as "addicting" and vice-versa. Eating a nice full meal is more enjoyable than eati
28.
by bogdanoff_2 6mo ago
The solution to this would be a law forcing these sites to allow third-party suggestion algorithms, so that you can choose who and how content is being suggested to you. It could be perhaps as simple as allowing third-party websites and app
29.
Show HN: Minecraft music player, with random intervals like in the game(paul-andre.github.io)
2 points by bogdanoff_2 7mo ago|0 comments
30.
by bogdanoff_2 8mo ago
Since you're very active with the commenting, what would you say is your definition of "bubble"?

More ›