boblemarin

5 ms·

1.
by boblemarin 11y ago
Exactly, there's not much optimisation in there. In fact, it was my first try with WebGL.
2.
by boblemarin 11y ago
:)
3.
by boblemarin 11y ago
The particles are attracted by the position of the mouse, each having a slightly different (randomized) attraction factor. If a particle ever reaches the exact mouse coordinates, its position is randomly generated anywhere on the screen. Wh
4.
by boblemarin 14y ago
Much of the code comes from a WebGL tutorial (context and shaders creation, and the shaders code). I added the interactive parts, the particles and tweaked the shaders.
5.
by boblemarin 14y ago
you can see screenshots and videos on that page : http://checkthis.com/7ezv (the WebGL animation is part of an interactive installation)
6.
by boblemarin 14y ago
The particle positions are indeed computed in Javascript, and even if the version you tried only had 30000 of them, the "real 80000" version [ http://minimal.be/lab/fluGL/index80000.html ] does not raise my CPU usage that much. A more cle
7.
by boblemarin 14y ago
Please, check my post below for the truth about the numbers http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4009469
8.
by boblemarin 14y ago
When I wrote that experiment (nearly one year ago), I started with 80000 but finally went for 30000 because it was smoother on my laptop. I just forgot to change the title when posting (it was a long ago, and I wasn't expecting it to get mu
9.
by boblemarin 15y ago
A browser who supports CSS 3D transforms : Firefox 10+, Chrome, Safari (better), Android 4 browser, iOS' browser (even better).
10.
by boblemarin 15y ago
Please consider this library as an invitation for web devs to dive into html-based multimedia. Its main goal is to highlight the ability to do such things. It is quite clear that Sprite3D will never reach the level of libraries like Three.j