bluefishinit

11 ms·

1.
by bluefishinit 2y ago
I don't think the Times Of Israel is an unbiased source. This isn't trustworthy reporting.
2.
by bluefishinit 2y ago
The original post is from the Times Of Israel. It's literally propaganda, we can at least discuss the content no?
3.
Google Workers Protest Cloud Contract with Israel's Government(wired.com)
24 points by bluefishinit 2y ago|1 comments
4.
by bluefishinit 2y ago
Full article: https://archive.is/ySRjm
5.
by bluefishinit 2y ago
Having access to first party reporting from Palestinians has effectively defeated Israel’s propaganda machine for younger generations in the west.
6.
by bluefishinit 2y ago
It was an illegal strike: > An Israeli airstrike carried out within Syria without its consent would be in contravention of Article 2(4) of the United Nations Charter, which prohibits a state from using force against the territorial inte
7.
by bluefishinit 2y ago
This is in retaliation for Israel bombing the Iranian embassy in Damascus: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israeli_bombing_of_the_Iranian...
8.
by bluefishinit 2y ago
X has an account called Canary Mission that doxxes students, professionals and random people in the street for speaking out against Israel. They’re also thought to be behind the real life intimidation campaign featuring people dressed in bi
9.
by bluefishinit 2y ago
I think we'll be seeing a lot more of this. It's a massive brand liability to have an association with Israel and there's an unknown potential for future damage.
10.
by bluefishinit 2y ago
4 day work weeks are the way to go. When I have 3 consecutive days to relax I'm 100% more recharged then when I have two. It's not even close.
11.
by bluefishinit 2y ago
I don't follow you. Osama Bin Laden said that the bombing of the WTC was in retaliation for Israel bombing Beirut: > God knows it did not cross our minds to attack the towers but after the situation became unbearable and we witness
12.
by bluefishinit 2y ago
Zionists did that and generally destabilized the entire region: https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/iraq-jews-attacks-zionist...
13.
by bluefishinit 2y ago
That's not true at all. Nakba was an ethnic cleansing of over 750,000 Palestinians. Voluntary Jewish immigration at behest of Zionist urging to Israel is not the same thing.
14.
by bluefishinit 2y ago
Resistance against occupation.
15.
by bluefishinit 2y ago
No. There are such a thing as war crimes and Israel has documented themselves committing them nearly continuously since October 7th.
16.
by bluefishinit 2y ago
Gaza was under complete blockade from Israel (after it was occupied by it). That's not an environment you can create reliable governance since it wasn't allowed to be a sovereign state.
17.
by bluefishinit 2y ago
Obviously they should!
18.
by bluefishinit 2y ago
Interesting how quickly this was addressed and redacted vs. the fabricated rape propaganda that Israel has been spreading about Oct 7th. Just as with this case, a family member said that there was no rape. The difference is that The New Yor
19.
by bluefishinit 2y ago
I get paid according to the value I create, it doesn't matter where I live.
20.
by bluefishinit 3y ago
People aren't fools. They know that TikTok is being put into this position by the US government. You can go on any social media platform right now and see how outraged TikTok users are. This is going to have incredible political blowba
21.
by bluefishinit 3y ago
TikTok's users will know who to blame: the US government. There would have been no problem at all before this bill got pushed through (if passed).
22.
by bluefishinit 3y ago
> What’s more, divestiture would require Beijing’s approval. Last year, the Chinese government said it opposed a forced sale. https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/markets/house-passes-tiktok-...
23.
by bluefishinit 3y ago
Opposing this ban isn't "malicious intent" lots of people think it's an infringement upon their rights for the US government to decide what they can and cannot see.
24.
by bluefishinit 3y ago
It's not useful though. I actually think it's very cool that TikTok got a bunch of young people to contact their representatives. If this ban goes through, the political blowback is going to be extreme. It will be like the Streisa
25.
by bluefishinit 3y ago
That's not a "botnet" though, advertising does the same thing. We don't call the people buying things they've been marketed a "botnet".
26.
by bluefishinit 3y ago
This level of censorship isn't good, it's very bad. It's also concerning the speed at which the government mobilized to do this. It's a rapid crackdown on free speech and individual freedom.
27.
by bluefishinit 3y ago
I get to choose the apps I use and certainly can (and do) take who owns them into consideration.
28.
by bluefishinit 3y ago
Yes, I am. I should get to use any app, under any ownership that I choose. This is a violation of my rights.
29.
by bluefishinit 3y ago
The users who want to use that app, should get to use that app. If there's content on the app that breaks the law, that content can be addressed directly. This thankfully will be a very politically costly move if they pull it off. Mill
30.
by bluefishinit 3y ago
I don't think any website or app should be banned just because the owner is accused of having an agenda (foreign or domestic owned). That's not society having "no order", it's basic freedom of speech and personal li

More ›