blhack

6 ms·

1.
by blhack 20d ago
YC has. There has been (if I remember correctly) batches entirely based on India.
2.
by blhack 3mo ago
What is going on at Anthropic? First, it comes out that on some specified subset of queries they will simply downgrade you to a different model. One example is if you are doing model research . Imagine OSX shutting down if it detects you’
3.
by blhack 4mo ago
Is there any obvious way to detect if you’ve gotten owned by this?
4.
by blhack 4mo ago
This is bad advice. The choice depends on which is more popular in your area. For me in Phoenix that’s meshtastic.
5.
by blhack 4mo ago
Meshtastic is really cool! The heltec v4 is the best board for it you can get on Amazon. Put it on your roof with a cheap solar panel meant for a security camera, and join it to your home WiFi. Just use the little plastic case it came in a
6.
by blhack 7mo ago
Well I certainly feel surveilled when I know that OpenAI will simply give up my data if asked. If anthro is saying they won’t, that’s good!
7.
by blhack 7mo ago
Strength is saying what they were asked to do. I want to know! Did the DoW ask them to make kill drones? Because if so THAT IS A REALLY BIG DEAL. The vagueness is irritating. He’s saying they won’t do something, the DoW is saying they do
8.
by blhack 7mo ago
>he said this >>no he didn’t he actually said the opposite of that and the link you just posted says the opposite of what you are claiming >but he might change his mind! Okay?
9.
by blhack 7mo ago
GOOD. I don’t want Anthropic, or anybody else to have their tools used for these things either. But Dario is showing weakness here by talking around it. Whatever they were asked to do, they should just be upfront about.
10.
by blhack 7mo ago
No, the DoW may be implicitly asking for those things. That’s the point I’m trying to make here: Anthropic should just say the unsaid thing here . DoW asked for the following thing: $foo. We won’t give that to them.
11.
by blhack 7mo ago
Because mass surveillance has been happening by every tech company under every president since George W. Bush, and despite everybody trying to stop it they haven’t been able to. OpenAI has already said that they’ll give up whatever info the
12.
by blhack 7mo ago
The first sentence of that post is: > The Department of War has no interest in using AI to conduct mass surveillance of Americans (which is illegal) nor do we want to use AI to develop autonomous weapons that operate without human involv
13.
by blhack 7mo ago
Then Anthropic should say: this is what the DoW has asked for, and we aren’t able to do it, or don’t want to.
14.
by blhack 7mo ago
The DoW has explicitly said they don’t want this, and what you are describing are not automated kill drones. Anthropic’s safeguards already prevent what you are describing, again the thing thar DoW has said they don’t want.
15.
by blhack 7mo ago
Right. Did the DoW ask for that? Or does Anthropic make a product that does that?
16.
by blhack 7mo ago
Did the DoW ask for these things? This whole thing seems like people talking past each other, and that there’s something being left unsaid. Anthropic doesn’t make a product that would assist with kill drones, and they don’t have the right t
17.
Ask HN: What have you built/shipped with Claude Code?
10 points by blhack 8mo ago|6 comments
18.
by blhack 8mo ago
Consider what the rise of things like shopify, squarespace, etc. did for developers. In 2001, you needed an entire development team if you wanted to have an online business. Having an online business was a complicated, niche thing. Now, be
19.
by blhack 8mo ago
I think you're talking about Renee Good - who is the other person?
20.
by blhack 8mo ago
Especially when the software they're developing is supposed to speed up the speed at which the software they are developing is developed.
21.
by blhack 8mo ago
Can you elaborate on this more? What would be a task you would use claude code for, and what would accomplishing the task look like?
22.
by blhack 11mo ago
These are all over the place in Tempe, AZ. I see them cruising through my neighborhood all the time. The funny thing is that there is usually a guy on an ebike following right behind, and he's usually just decked out in sortof tacti
23.
by blhack 2y ago
I will happily pay for high quality news. Every few months I check back in with The Financial Times to see if I can get it delivered to my house again (they used to deliver in Phoenix, but stopped, presumably they lost their printing partn
24.
by blhack 2y ago
How could this possibly comply with European "right to be forgotten" legislation? In fact, how could any of these AI models comply with that? If a user requests to be forgotten, is the entire model retrained (I don't think
25.
by blhack 2y ago
Have you ever seen the Northern Lights with your eyes? If so I'm curious where you saw them. I echo what some other posters here have said: they're certainly not gray.
26.
by blhack 2y ago
Was there a similar backlash to this identical ad from LG in 2009? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NcUAQ2i5Tfo
27.
by blhack 2y ago
Yes! I love Aronofsky's work. The Fountain is a hauntingly beautiful film. The poster from this film hangs in my children's bedroom and I can't wait to watch it with them when they're ready for that type of story.
28.
by blhack 2y ago
Synecdoche NY, specifically this scene: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z9PzSNy3xj0 But there is also a scene (which I cannot find online) where the main character (a playwright) is explaining that the only way to make his
29.
by blhack 3y ago
Sorry if that was confusing. I mean that for instance: tmobile will be adding this to their coverage map, but they're not getting rid of the towers, and the primary way your phone is communicating with the world is not going to be via
30.
by blhack 3y ago
I believe this is addressed in the video that I linked. There are very good compression algorithms to allow voice, and "browsing" means something akin to slow dialup. This is not something that could, for instance, replace your

More ›