blazespin

6 ms·

1.
by blazespin 2mo ago
Are there terms clear? I dunno. There are ways to train on API usage without training on API usage.
2.
by blazespin 2mo ago
yeah, is it API or codex?
3.
by blazespin 3mo ago
I think the point is less "how can we throw shade on the OP" and more "a harness can enable a lot of models to do very serious cybersec, glm 5.2 is one of them"
4.
by blazespin 3mo ago
Yeah, I am seeing this as well, especially as people use AI to code review stuff more so this sort of thing slips through. On one very large project I am looking at, it's already becoming harder to find issues. These people whinging a
5.
by blazespin 3mo ago
Just optimized AI driven fuzzing. Do a search on arxiv you'll find a lot.
6.
by blazespin 3mo ago
I have a dozen or so critical CVEs now, it's not hard to believe at all if they're just hardening tasks. I can get a dozen hardening tasks from just one prompt. I don't even bother filing them as the critical ones are more
7.
by blazespin 3mo ago
This is ludicrous logic. We already know that there is an AI firehose. You don't need to do this. They should have used proper disclosure. All this is doing is making the AI firehose worse.
8.
GPT-5.6 Preview System Card(deploymentsafety.openai.com)
3 points by blazespin 3mo ago|1 comments
9.
OpenAI set to limit GPT 5.6 rollout after call from Trump administration(cnbc.com)
1 points by blazespin 3mo ago|1 comments
10.
by blazespin 3mo ago
Pretty soon I suspect, otherwise Chinese models are going to have free reign to develop brand goodwill. Question is how this impacts the international posture.
11.
by blazespin 3mo ago
Ban on Chinese models is coming on pretty soon. Seems unlikely they're going to shut down openAI and anthropic, but not foreign models.
12.
by blazespin 3mo ago
The hilarious thing here is anthropic is basically admitting that most of their Capabilities can be easily copied.
13.
by blazespin 3mo ago
Executive staff seems money-hungry for sure (note the lack of non profit that OpenAI has) I would say they have researchers with self-important god complexes that makes them think they know better than everyone else.
14.
by blazespin 3mo ago
There are a lot of dangerous things in the world and surprisingly a lot of people can avoid the constant stream of chicken little nonsense. If everyone expended the same amount of marketing effort trying to scare the ** out of everyone that
15.
by blazespin 3mo ago
There is a potentially another explanation: fable 5 did something truly dangerous.
16.
by blazespin 3mo ago
Very very patronizing of him to get upvoted.
17.
by blazespin 4mo ago
yes, pure engagement farmer. Marketing yourself is a big part of the biz these days. Thanks, social media
18.
by blazespin 4mo ago
not hard, massive elo stuff. every decision point needs to think up and implement 25 ideas and then rank them.
19.
by blazespin 4mo ago
The problem is that the only thing that has proved out so far is cyber security. Unfortunately cyber security improvements is not going to improve living standards, and it's just going to increase the cost of just doing business. Ther
20.
by blazespin 4mo ago
it's very silly, but not a big deal. Arxiv is becoming irrelevant these days anyways. In fact would be better if they just banned AI, so we could just get off the luddite platforms. Automated research is the future, end of story. And
21.
by blazespin 5mo ago
Pure gaslighting. The PM panic is because people want to look like they 'care' about corrupt trading. It's peanuts compared to the 500M they were betting on oil futures.
22.
by blazespin 5mo ago
No, because that's real money.
23.
by blazespin 5mo ago
Safety versus Distillation, guess we see what's more important.
24.
by blazespin 5mo ago
Because bots and trillion dollar ipos and even bigger stakes. People need to better appreciate the level of manipulation going on. Social media has an outsized impact. Bots and even people are getting paid to post and upvote/downvot
25.
by blazespin 5mo ago
Anthropic's reply? A model you can't use.
26.
by blazespin 5mo ago
Dario is big on beating china, and no doubt he believes cyber security is how to do that. You can tell, but anthropic is sht at everything else. Nobody uses it for real research.
27.
by blazespin 5mo ago
Anthropic needs money like the 112B OpenAI got. They could be hyping and this is good hype. Who knows how benchmaxxed they are. If they provide access to 3rd party benchmarking (not just one) than maybe I'll believe it. Until then..
28.
by blazespin 5mo ago
Yeah, need some good RE benchmarks for the LLMs. :) RE is very interesting problem. A lot more that SWE can be RE'd. I've found the LLMs are reluctant to assist, though you can workaround.
29.
by blazespin 7mo ago
All I've ever seen is it encouraging people and not discouraging them. The thrill of the easy money, right? Forget it jake, it's Polymarket.
30.
by blazespin 7mo ago
Yeah, trying to beat the market on actually predicting will get you pretty lame returns. Probably do better in non zero sum games like the stock market. At least there you get the benefit of the market always going up eventually. No, the

More ›