blackflame7001

4 ms·

1.
by blackflame7001 7y ago
What about the disenfranchisement of citizens who's will is overrun by people not eligible to vote? Are you really trying to convince me that we should make our elections insecure because some people want to vote in federal election wh
2.
by blackflame7001 7y ago
"that doesn’t exist in practice" It's ridiculous to assert that it doesn't exist in practice due to lack of evidence when in reality pretending to be someone else to vote leaves virtually no evidence. You can't even
3.
by blackflame7001 7y ago
I don't get your argument. If something doesn't work on the small scale it certainly won't work on a large scale. That's exactly my original point about managing global finance
4.
by blackflame7001 7y ago
How else would you do it on a machine not connected to the internet?
5.
by blackflame7001 7y ago
Neither does machine tampering because they are not networked.
6.
by blackflame7001 7y ago
The whole point of this article is to make elections more secure not be complacent with the status quo. Not having an ID and needing an ID to vote are 2 different issues that democrats insist on making the same. Just give every citizen a fr
7.
by blackflame7001 7y ago
Go look for Russian collusion, “it’ll be hard to find some, because historically it just doesn't happen” Still satisfied with your argument?
8.
by blackflame7001 7y ago
You start off speaking for a group and end saying you’re only speaking for a percentage of that group. You just totally invalidated the basis of your argument from earlier
9.
by blackflame7001 7y ago
It’s totally necessary because HN is predictable as clock work to downvote when you insinuate the liberal standard has flaws, the biggest of which is the inability to be critical of themselves without instinctively reacting to inflict pain
10.
by blackflame7001 7y ago
Your comment makes no sense in context with the original article. Why would someone spend all the time and effort to hack voting machines when they can just walk up look at the list and pick a name without a signature and say yup thats me.
11.
by blackflame7001 7y ago
Then why are Democrats against showing an ID to prove you are who you say you are? Why are Democrats OK with allowing ballot harvesting in California when the election in North Carolina was invalidated for the same reason?
12.
by blackflame7001 8y ago
Naw, 5G will finally end the telecom monopoly on the utility poles. Netflix beat blockbuster by being smarter, Microsoft lost its edge in mobile by being complacent. Monopolies in a non-crony version of capitalism are not bad in their own r
13.
by blackflame7001 8y ago
Naw, 5G will finally end the telecom monopoly on the utility poles. Netflix bet blockbuster by being smarter, Microsoft lost its edge in mobile by being complacent. Monopolies in a non-crony version of capitalism are not bad in their own ri
14.
by blackflame7001 8y ago
So without Big Government, Steve Jobs would have just called it quits then? Get real! Its the entrepreneurial spirit that drove them to compete and what drives any successful company to compete. There's always a new model private jet c
15.
by blackflame7001 8y ago
this scenario has literally never happened. I wish I could downvote this stupid comment because it's moronic.
16.
by blackflame7001 8y ago
Then how did Netflix dethrone Comcast? Goliath doesn't always win. The person who makes the superior product wins. Apple is almost never first to market with an idea anymore because they simply wait and do it better. New companies with
17.
by blackflame7001 8y ago
So how did Netflix dethrone Comcast if Goliath always wins?