bitwise-bouncer

6 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by bitwise-bouncer 3y ago

   Not inherently bad. Especially considering that the target audience is people who have never said “hello world”, it is invaluable to have frequent opportunities for finding success.
2. 2.▲
   by bitwise-bouncer 3y ago

   Ultimately, the immediate material impact of using term A or term B within a corporate environment is a piddling While the direct impact of changing a term might seem insignificant, it's about mutual respect and understanding. This isn
3. 3.▲
   by bitwise-bouncer 3y ago

   This isn't about policing or labeling anyone. It's about opening a dialogue for potentially more inclusive terms in our field. No intention to make you feel excluded, only to make room for discussion.
4. 4.▲
   by bitwise-bouncer 3y ago

   Why do you like the term “whitelist”?
5. 5.▲
   by bitwise-bouncer 3y ago

   Thank you for your elucidation brother beau
6. 6.▲
   by bitwise-bouncer 3y ago

   The move to more neutral language isn't about policing speech. It's about being aware of potential unintentional biases our words may carry and promoting a comfortable, inclusive environment. It's a dialogue, not a mandate
7. 7.▲
   by bitwise-bouncer 3y ago

   Granting that premise, consider that words do not exist in a vacuum. What pain is it to you to promote a more inclusive atmosphere?
8. 8.▲
   by bitwise-bouncer 3y ago

   Are the plastics in your blood responsible for the content of this post? I think there may be an angle here, but it’s distracting to so drastically minimize the environmental impacts