biscottigelato

6 ms·

1.
by biscottigelato 1y ago
Recovering and reusing something that went up and down And something that went orbital at supersonic speed Is not even remotely the same universe McDonell Douglas have done up and down since 1992 SpaceX is the only entity that have recovere
2.
by biscottigelato 2y ago
He's finding it applicable more than the narrow historical context and using it here. You can disagree with it but its not a 'misuse'
3.
by biscottigelato 2y ago
Arrest Telegram channel mods then
4.
by biscottigelato 2y ago
Apple literally won a case against the FBI on this. That's the US tho of course with First Amendment and everything...
5.
by biscottigelato 2y ago
So all implementation of encryption is illegal, that's basically your stance? Because that's exactly what encryption does.
6.
by biscottigelato 2y ago
Because 'we' want to. Who is this 'we' you are speaking about? Globalist authoritarian elite that you are somehow part of? Democratic voters? Communication application users? Whose this 'we'?
7.
by biscottigelato 2y ago
I agree. You are free to start one too~
8.
by biscottigelato 2y ago
Profit has not been the goal. If profit is the goal, one'd start another eyeball catching internet application. As the joke goes, the way to make a small fortune in space, is to start with a big fortune. SpaceX is the exception, not th
9.
by biscottigelato 2y ago
Wouldn't you wonder why then that it seems, at least according to you, society have went backwards and not forward in this time frame? "We have to have a collective look at what 1st-world governments, the media, and most "ord
10.
by biscottigelato 3y ago
Also donors. They received a ton of donations when they were a pure non-profit from people that got no board seat, no equities, with the believe that they will stick to their mission.
11.
by biscottigelato 3y ago
That further centralizes, makes matter worse. Government is also extremely inefficient. To build the service it'll cost them 10x more than private companies doing it. How much do you want to pay in taxes? There will come a point that e
12.
by biscottigelato 3y ago
This assumes thew birth rate holds steady at what it is today (1.1 or something?). My suspicion is that the birth rate will actually trend lower...
13.
by biscottigelato 3y ago
Mice utopia
14.
by biscottigelato 3y ago
Tesla cutting prices aggressively at the expense of both their own margins, but also of other automakers having their market share and revenue shrinking massively, puts this WSJ theory immediately to bed.
15.
by biscottigelato 3y ago
Because the ability to influence others is more important than 1 or 2 standard deviation in more intelligence. However if we are talking about 10x more intelligence, then that'd be a whole different ball game. Check Alpha Go -> Alph
16.
by biscottigelato 3y ago
I think it makes sense to debate whether this pause can or cannot work and the game theory behind it. But to those that trivializes the potential danger of AI and compare it to the likes of climate change is ignorant at best. AI has been co
17.
by biscottigelato 3y ago
It WAS a non-profit. I am not sure if it still is one today.
18.
by biscottigelato 3y ago
Climate change and instability of world order doesn't end humanity. They are barely considered an extinction event. AI Alignment is consistently voted the top potential cause to extinct the human race. They are not even close. https:&
19.
by biscottigelato 3y ago
Job displacement is a silly problem compared to the AI Alignment problem. One is some human misery (but a lot of societal benefit to other groups of humans at the same time). The other one is all of us, the entire species and the future of
20.
by biscottigelato 3y ago
Its the one ring with the ultimate power. But so powerful that it might, if not almost certainly will, end us all. Perhaps this IS the solution to the Fermi Paradox.
21.
by biscottigelato 3y ago
What we need is more funding into AI Alignment research. An X-Prize equivalent. All current big AI companies should fund it, to the tune of 20%+ of revenue from AI businesses. And I am okay to have government enforce this if needed even tho
22.
by biscottigelato 3y ago
Climate change is not even close to humanity ending. At max wipe out a few coastal cities. And even that is unlikely because those that screams 'climate change' the loudest has the most assets in coastal prime real estates. Humans
23.
by biscottigelato 4y ago
Classic reading a pattern when there is none.
24.
by biscottigelato 4y ago
Exactly. A sufficiently intelligent AI can easily make a human do its bidding, through incentive, coercion, emotional manipulation. Easy peasy. Didn't GPT-4 already did that to a Task Rabbit worker?
25.
by biscottigelato 4y ago
SVB had $45B withdrawals on their $175B deposit base. That is not a small amount of withdrawals. JPM has $500B of cash and cash equivalents on their $3T deposit base. Of which only ~$34B is in actual cash. Even JPM would fall (without Fed b
26.
by biscottigelato 4y ago
Definitely not in defence of free market capitalism. In defence of an oligarchy more like.
27.
by biscottigelato 4y ago
Underrated comment.
28.
by biscottigelato 4y ago
I am assuming you are sarcastic instead of extremely ignorant.
29.
by biscottigelato 4y ago
That's the exact problem. AI is centralizing. So is empowering the government. Not to mention if AI development is heavily red-taped in one jurisdiction, its development will simply move to a more lax jurisdiction. It makes things even
30.
by biscottigelato 4y ago
Spot on. AI is extremely centralizing and extremely powerful. I'm a big Bitcoiner and definitely against big government. But I fail to see what feasible counter there is except for something as totalitarian and powerful as the governme

More ›