bingud

6 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by bingud 4mo ago

   Depends on how you'd want to control the access, you could make an account for each email and configure access per account/role, or share the files publicly and set a password (you can set a different password per user). For more
2. 2.▲
   by bingud 4mo ago

   I haven't heard of OFM so I didn't design it around those specs, but i'll look into it. Thanks for the link
3. 3.▲
   by bingud 4mo ago

   That's one of the use-cases I had in mind when making this. The permissions are right in the sidebar, so that it's easy to set which people can (or can't) see or edit a given file.
4. 4.▲
   by bingud 4mo ago

   Thanks, I guess a more conventional way to call it would be something along the lines of self-hosted cloud storage. I'd say it's about halfway between Google Drive and Windows Explorer.
5. 5.▲
   by bingud 4mo ago

   Sorry, I didn't explain that properly. I meant app-level permissions rather than actual filesystem permissions. There are some file managers that offer permissions, but only for their own internal data folder, so they don't work f
6. 6.▲
   Show HN: Filemat – an open-source web-based file manager(github.com)

   18 points by bingud 4mo ago|14 comments
7. 7.▲
   by bingud 4mo ago

   thats a cool idea, nice app maybe 'star-history.com' could be filtered from the README so that people cant cheat by looking at the star graph
8. 8.▲
   by bingud 4mo ago

   Seems like a promising and useful model but its probably scary how much customer data they fed into it to reach this performance