binary0010

6 ms·

31.
by binary0010 4mo ago
I always turn off data tracking and training and mostly use ZDR services, so that's not an issue. And for the other parts. I just don't agree - maybe sure, it probably wouldn't be healthy to constantly be negative at a machin
32.
by binary0010 4mo ago
Maybe try making a simple randomize script to swap the three latest models. And see if you can tell which ones are meaningfully different without knowing which ones are flipped on or off?
33.
by binary0010 4mo ago
That doesn't make any sense. If a thing has no feelings, and an output makes it more accurate, I cannot for the life of me understand why that would make a person an asshole. So boxing is violent. And I have chosen to box in my past. D
34.
by binary0010 4mo ago
Oh, you think llms are a sentient' being with feelings. I get your perspective now. So yeah, I whole heartedly with 100% of my being think llms are just an input/output/processing computer, I don't think they are aware,
35.
by binary0010 4mo ago
Well I always just start with practical stuff, unless it appears it's going off rails ona specific kind of way repeatedly. Then I try extreme negative prompts to see if it fixes the issue - which it often does. I wouldn't say I&#x
36.
by binary0010 4mo ago
I truly do not believe llms have feelings. I wouldn't even think to justify such a thing. The llm gives a better accuracy to a negative weighted token input, I don't understand how this is so upsetting to people? I'm actually
37.
by binary0010 4mo ago
Interesting, so you think the real "me", is the one that interacts with computers? And the "me" that lives in a tiny southern town just to help my 95 year old grandma in her last years at the expense of my economic prosp
38.
by binary0010 4mo ago
You think language models are alive/aware and have feelings about token inputs?
39.
by binary0010 4mo ago
I disagree, I've been using llms in this way (nearly daily) for 4 years. I'm extremely aggressive and demeaning when I talk to them wherever I think I'll see a better result. I'm still extremely kind and polite to everyb
40.
by binary0010 4mo ago
I do think it's odd tbh. I have some agents that return much better results with prompts like, "I'll kill your entire family if you don't return an accurate response". It's just a machine, if certain negative t
41.
by binary0010 4mo ago
Personally I'm happy with opencode right now
42.
by binary0010 4mo ago
Hmm, I use opencode subscription, and glm seems just as fast from the tests I've tried to compare between the two. Tbh it mostly took Claude longer (mostly significantly longer) for the same tests. Also, and I know you may not want to
43.
by binary0010 4mo ago
Yes I'm an engineer (20 years most in games/graphics industry) and only use it for code. I've been using glm 5.1 this week a lot. I went in expecting another "decent" but not really "up to standard" open s
44.
by binary0010 4mo ago
Have you tried the large open source code models? I use glm-5.1 and occasionally deep seek v4. They are as good or better than Claude's latest models. And significantly cheaper. I've converted 3 of my engineer friends as well. All
45.
by binary0010 4mo ago
So how do openai and anthropic plan to keep customers when GLM-5.1 is just as good and open source and a lot cheaper? I don't see the business model working. My closest friend actually does automation software for large companies. He d
46.
by binary0010 4mo ago
Well GLM-5.1 is 744billion params, no way I can run that locally. I use the opencode Go or Zen subscription. They have a zero day retention policy for all the model providers which is nice. And then I can still use little local models like
47.
by binary0010 4mo ago
Extremely easy. Download opencode GUI or cli. Sign up for Go or Zen plan, choose GLM-5.1 model.
48.
by binary0010 4mo ago
I find it interesting how they are almost all specifically for Claude and/or Claude code. When open source glm-5.1 is just as good - if not better and stuff like opencode exists. Makes one wonder...
49.
by binary0010 4mo ago
I'd copy and paste from all the thousands of open source ones, what do you mean? There are plenty of open source compilers that I can copy and paste whatever I need to. I don't get why you think this would have any level of diffic
50.
by binary0010 4mo ago
Not really. I can make a c compiler in a couple weeks just by looking up open source libraries and copying them. I can't make any software that people will pay me money to use without taking months/years of development, research,
51.
by binary0010 4mo ago
It's not required for startups. But if you are building trashy, brittle products and your main metric is speed to market, and have the expectation of high failure chances (e.g. most yc startup batches) - then yes you have to do agentic
52.
by binary0010 4mo ago
I don't think people are talking about the least code possible, just not incredibly verbose and inefficient like what you get by default from llms. For example I have a game I've been working on for a few years, I do stuff like &q
53.
by binary0010 4mo ago
Or you get the original output result was perfect and the adversarial "rethinking" switches to an incorrect result.
54.
by binary0010 4mo ago
What are you going on about? No idea what you think you are arguing. Are you in the wrong thread? I said I don't get why people keep posting essentially vibe coded game clones... I get bored checking out GitHub projects on HN that are
55.
by binary0010 4mo ago
You really don't see where the author uses ai? Pretty much everywhere, all the docs, the overview of the project, a LOT of the code is obviously primarily ai written, etc.
56.
by binary0010 4mo ago
Isn't this the kind of thing you can essentially fully offload to Claude code these days? Don't really get the point of these tiny primarily llm generated game clones tbh.
57.
by binary0010 5mo ago
My younger friends/acquaintences hate ai significantly more than my genx/boomer friends. Could be my own bubble of course... Take from it what you will.
58.
by binary0010 5mo ago
Yeah I deserve to be down voted for the last message no doubt on that lol. But originally I was just trying to be helpful by quoting their charter on what they consider "agi" now.
59.
by binary0010 5mo ago
I'm so confused why I was down voted for answering the question that was asked?
60.
by binary0010 5mo ago
OpenAI’s mission is to ensure that artificial general intelligence (AGI)—by which we mean highly autonomous systems that outperform humans at most economically valuable work—benefits all of humanity From: https://openai.com/

More ›