bigger_fish

8 ms·

1.
by bigger_fish 4mo ago
Wow, you're taking in an Orwellian direction. The reason my extension doesn't qualify as a gatekeeper under your definition is that its use is distributed, not centralized. Each individual user gets to set the tolerance threshold
2.
by bigger_fish 4mo ago
To your first point, yes, I agree. I would continue the thought that many of them are irritated with it and would rather not see it at all. To the second point, that's the idea behind the adjustable threshold. It is indeed hard to dist
3.
by bigger_fish 4mo ago
Good question! The idea is that if the tools like this gain sufficient adoption, people will stop seeing gen-AI content. Why post if no views? If you need people to take you seriously and there is a chance that they will judge you for your
4.
by bigger_fish 4mo ago
Cool stuff! I published a conceptually similar extension just yesterday. Check out "How to Kill the Dead Internet," also presently here on shownew.
5.
by bigger_fish 4mo ago
Cool stuff! GH star added.
6.
by bigger_fish 4mo ago
Thanks! It's actually dynamic. The backend contains a sequence that checks daily for new model updates and human-published documents regarding AI writing tells, then adjusts scoring accordingly. That scoring methodology is the only par
7.
by bigger_fish 4mo ago
I suppose that depends on what you mean by gatekeeper. Is it intended to keep the robots out? Yes, in that sense it belongs to the Cloudflare camp of bot detection software, not really a new thing. AI-speak won't become average-speak i
8.
Show HN: How to Kill the Dead Internet(chromewebstore.google.com)
10 points by bigger_fish 4mo ago|11 comments
9.
by bigger_fish 4mo ago
You mean like the Google login QR I can already bypass with an extension? I'm not sure this is a real step forward in the arms race, and I'm cool with that.
10.
by bigger_fish 4mo ago
Totally agree. The sales pitch is that anyone can use this stuff, but good output is only obtained via thorough understanding.