big_elephant

6 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by big_elephant 2y ago

   Thanks!
2. 2.▲
   by big_elephant 2y ago

   Is it fair to say that if you have a high read\low write service, you could use this as a sort of local cache (with the added benefit that it also handles staleness through the sync) on the service itself, to reduce latency from not just ca
3. 3.▲
   by big_elephant 2y ago

   also saw this: https://x.com/peregrine/status/1830954206234071515
4. 4.▲
   by big_elephant 2y ago

   does anyone know what stage this is in and what the path forward\timeline would be?
5. 5.▲
   by big_elephant 4y ago

   if you round down he has zero billion
6. 6.▲
   by big_elephant 4y ago

   seems like that support reversed course a month later: https://apnews.com/article/japan-fumio-kishida-names-new-cab...
7. 7.▲
   by big_elephant 5y ago

   this is amazing. does anyone know how one would get started building something like this?
8. 8.▲
   by big_elephant 8y ago

   sorry, i shouldn't have mentioned caching. the emphasis should have only been on connection speed
9. 9.▲
   by big_elephant 8y ago

   it depends on who will be downloading the bundle. if it's a group of consistent users primarily using desktop browsers, it may not be worth worrying about since they'll probably download it once at a fast speed and reuse from the
10. 10.▲
    by big_elephant 8y ago

    excellent video, thanks. custom elements are a very interesting alternative
11. 11.▲
    by big_elephant 8y ago

    hm i'm not sure why ports would not work in that use case (the keycloak one, right?). the port would be how you communicate between js and elm, so it looks like inside the js callbacks is where you would `send` that data through the po