bheadmaster

10 ms·

1.
by bheadmaster 6d ago
> Which is true as well Not quite, as if it was, the War on Drugs would succeed. Instead, it failed spectacularly. People using Meta products are not making an arbitrary choice that happens to be evil. They are using Meta because other p
2.
by bheadmaster 7d ago
"People who are using this shit of a drug should be aware that they are part of the problem with every line they do, whenever they fetch a bag of cocaine. You are part of the problem"
3.
by bheadmaster 9d ago
> It’s dark times for employment currently unless you’ve got a rare nepotism path. In the civilized society, we call that "recommendation".
4.
by bheadmaster 11d ago
It's because we're no longer a burden. Many parents would gasp at this sentence, but the same parents would likely complain to anyone who'd listen about how negatively their children are affecting their lives.
5.
by bheadmaster 26d ago
I've had an idea for an automated verification for a while, but too busy to implement it. For every property of the system, implement a mock that simulates a system that works, and multiple variations with forseeable bugs (models are f
6.
by bheadmaster 26d ago
Are there any technical reasons to override native scrolling functionality in the first place?
7.
by bheadmaster 1mo ago
Make sure to take reporting negativity bias into account. People will speak up when they don't like something, while stay quiet when everything is fine. I, personally, enjoy Buf. It has solved many frustrations I've had with The W
8.
by bheadmaster 1mo ago
Your comment is AI. My tarot reader gypsy woman flagged it with 95% confidence
9.
by bheadmaster 1mo ago
Yeah, I'm not interested in decoding what you meant by your aphorism. Either say what you mean or don't.
10.
by bheadmaster 1mo ago
System V ABI is pretty standardized.
11.
by bheadmaster 1mo ago
It's possible in the future we will have Rick and Morty style AI in literally everything just because it's so easy to add it. Sentient Switchblade: "Hi Beth! You've gotten taller! Shall we resume stabbing?"
12.
by bheadmaster 1mo ago
Those who can't do, teach.
13.
by bheadmaster 1mo ago
I explained in detail why value classes will not outdate this criticism. The syntax is not the point - the point is the very fact that they had to add new syntax means that they couldn't retrofit the semantics into the old syntax. Wh
14.
by bheadmaster 2mo ago
My criticism was not "you can't do this" - my criticism was that Java requires an overengineered GC to compensate for its fundamental language flaws that make optimization all but impossible. Go's GC is nowhere near as c
15.
by bheadmaster 2mo ago
I assume you're referring to value classes? The very fact that Project Valhalla had to create new opt-in syntax for value classes, in order to get what Go does by default on all its types, is the admission of defeat of a herculean ba
16.
by bheadmaster 2mo ago
Yeah, they have to be in order to make up for the braindead decision of making every variable a pointer to heap allocated memory. Go wins not by technical ingenuity, but by simply not making fundamentally bad decisions in the first place.
17.
by bheadmaster 2mo ago
What do you mean by "strict typing of its index"?
18.
by bheadmaster 2mo ago
Language is more than just its syntax and features. The most important "features" of Go are fast compilation, orthogonality of features, and easy development. Their propositions may "look like everyone else" if you'
19.
by bheadmaster 2mo ago
On ARM systems with LSE both weak and strong compile to the same CAS instruction anyway. On LL/SC, using strong means CPU will attempt to retry the same exchange on spurious failure, which increases likelihood that another thread will
20.
by bheadmaster 2mo ago
> NOTE: Throughout our implementation we strictly use compare_exchange_strong, but the C++ standard suggests that for some systems like ARM it mighe be a better idea to run a loop with compare_exchange_weak for better performance. The pr
21.
by bheadmaster 2mo ago
> allowing AI agents to act as abuse sponges for troubled people People have been getting angry at machines for a long time. Work, you stupid printer! Asshole Windows updating at the worst time just to mess with me. Go to hell, toas
22.
by bheadmaster 2mo ago
VMs and containers are fairly isolated and reproducible. A separate user on your machine still depends on the programs installed locally.
23.
by bheadmaster 2mo ago
For the first time in human history, military power doesn't require advantage in numbers. The rich will simply build an artificial army and use it to control everything. Kinda like Mr House from Fallout New Vegas.
24.
by bheadmaster 2mo ago
Exactly. You've hit the nail on the head. And quite frankly, your AI slop garbage radar is not just an indicator of good taste — it's the essence of humanity that keeps you above it.
25.
by bheadmaster 3mo ago
I can get the same thing with an aux cable
26.
by bheadmaster 3mo ago
In some corporate networks, everything is locked tight, and if you want any access (outbound or inbound), you have to send a request with business justification. What we had was many devices behind such corporate networks. Instead of reques
27.
by bheadmaster 3mo ago
How do you use -J to connect to a device that isn't publicly reachable?
28.
by bheadmaster 3mo ago
There's an old blogpost I wrote at the time I came up with this method [0]. I think it contains most of the technical details. Let me know if anything is confusing, I'll answer it here. [0] https://paskozdilar.github.io
29.
by bheadmaster 3mo ago
How would you use ProxyJump with Reverse Forwarding?
30.
by bheadmaster 3mo ago
If you have many different remote devices behind NATs or firewalls, a cool trick to access them all via EC2 server (or such) is to setup Remote Forwarding via UNIX socket on the server side, to devices' port 22. Preferably, UNIX socket

More ›