Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
bharatgel
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
1.
▲
Capacity planning with hyper local events
(allevents.ai)
2 points
by
bharatgel
1mo ago
|
0 comments
2.
▲
Show HN: I made awesome lists available through CLI+Skills and MCP
(context-awesome.com)
2 points
by
bharatgel
3mo ago
|
0 comments
3.
▲
by
bharatgel
11mo ago
Nice project! Feel free to add to https://github.com/bh-rat/awesome-mcp-enterprise if it's enterprise ready
4.
▲
by
bharatgel
1y ago
I further explored what MCP on gRPC looks like. gRPC's strong typing and reflection/descriptor discovery make it a great alternative for the tool calling / MCP. In the first part I'd tried out ListTools + a generic CallT
5.
▲
by
bharatgel
1y ago
A curated list of awesome Model Context Protocol solutions for for building, finding, hosting, learning, securing, and using MCP offerings. Sharing the current list here : --- Private Registries Ready-to-use pluggable MCP server implementat
6.
▲
Show HN: mcp-db – session/event store & distributed scaling for MCP
(github.com)
1 points
by
bharatgel
1y ago
|
0 comments
7.
▲
by
bharatgel
1y ago
UTCP ? https://utcp.io/
8.
▲
by
bharatgel
1y ago
You missed the MCP client/host distinction :p jk, great explanation.
9.
▲
by
bharatgel
1y ago
Hahaha, complete savage!
10.
▲
by
bharatgel
1y ago
Pure genius!
11.
▲
by
bharatgel
1y ago
I saw Invariant Labs and I upvoted this. :) Definitely reading it as well.
12.
▲
by
bharatgel
1y ago
Yeah, all I am getting is "This domain is available for sale!"
13.
▲
Show HN: I added webhook response support for MCP tool calls in asyncmcp
(github.com)
2 points
by
bharatgel
1y ago
|
0 comments
14.
▲
The pain of writing a Custom Transport for MCP
(medium.com)
1 points
by
bharatgel
1y ago
|
1 comments
15.
▲
by
bharatgel
1y ago
While building async custom transport for MCP (Model Context Protocol), I found the official spec for writing custom transports broken, the “concepts” guide overwhelming, and no base interfaces in the python SDK. stdio implementation is tri
16.
▲
by
bharatgel
1y ago
I'm curious how you're making the polling for results approach work right now? Is it a conditional logic that depends on the result from MCP. Or you let the LLM keep deciding on what to do next?
17.
▲
by
bharatgel
1y ago
Thanks, glad it resonates :)
18.
▲
Show HN: asyncmcp – Run MCP over async transport via AWS SNS+SQS
(github.com)
35 points
by
bharatgel
1y ago
|
4 comments