bgw

4 ms·

1.
by bgw 8y ago
That has no affect on this tracking.
2.
by bgw 8y ago
mine was 4.5 miles off
3.
by bgw 9y ago
The telecoms need to be made "dumb pipe[s]" in the US before we start worrying about Google.
4.
by bgw 9y ago
How are they "hostile to sites where the data originates" when Google is the primary driver of traffic to those sites?
5.
by bgw 9y ago
Search engines have improved. Bing, DDG, Yahoo are all better than Altavista. But none of them are as good as Google. That being said, no entity is above criticism. The monopoly criticism just doesn't fit though, unless we're rede
6.
by bgw 9y ago
How far would IBM or Microsoft or Apple have gotten without patents?
7.
by bgw 9y ago
It has always been strange for me to understand Google search as a monopoly. First, there are competitors. Second, it's free (yes, I know you pay with data). Third, you can use the internet without using any of Google's services (
8.
by bgw 10y ago
Government spends money with more accountability and with more efficacy than charities do.
9.
by bgw 10y ago
Yes. A lot of media critiques try to discern bias in the content. However, bias exists prior to that. What and who is covered is bias. Ignoring a topic could be bias not how the topic is covered.
10.
by bgw 10y ago
Disregarding context in a narrow focus image, how can you differentiate between male and female nipples?
11.
by bgw 10y ago
I agree with everything you are stating except that IMs can't replace email anymore than email can be 100% secure. Apples and oranges.