bernardwilson

5 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by bernardwilson 14y ago

   This would be a valid argument for not persisting dates as relative values. It isn't an valid argument against presenting dates this way. The OP's POV seems, to my eye, driven by the fact that primitive screen-scrapers can't just run a
2. 2.▲
   by bernardwilson 14y ago

   This is the wrongest thing I've read in ages. a) Who cares about screenshots? "I'm going to the pub on Thursday" suffers from exactly the same issue. b) Nonsense. Of course relative dates are machine readable. But anyway, web rendering != A
3. 3.▲
   by bernardwilson 15y ago

   Or you just use Cloudbees' DEV@cloud..
4. 4.▲
   by bernardwilson 15y ago

   All you need is www.jenkins-ci.org
5. 5.▲
   by bernardwilson 15y ago

   This article : utter piffle.
6. 6.▲
   by bernardwilson 15y ago

   I was expecting that to be a list of really, really expensive rates. That's actually pretty cheap.
7. 7.▲
   by bernardwilson 15y ago

   I had a similar idea about 10 years ago, but never got around to implementing it. I'm amazed at the amount of hatred directed towards this - as if the terminal could in NO WAY be improved?!. But clearly it can. For example - wouldn't it be
8. 8.▲
   by bernardwilson 15y ago

   The fight was over control. The trademark issue meant that it didn't matter what the community wanted, it could be 1,000,000 : 1 against, if the 1 was Oracle, they could stop (or force) anything they wanted. Commercial interests had wanted
9. 9.▲
   by bernardwilson 15y ago

   Hudson = moribund. Check github. All the developers now do Jenkins.
10. 10.▲
    by bernardwilson 16y ago

    No, some of Bs will be known as they're public patches. the remaining aggregate of C would be 'redhat patch to 2.6.x-y'.
11. 11.▲
    by bernardwilson 16y ago

    Would it not be possible to compute what patches have been applied? I'd guess for many patches it'd be trivially easy to determine if they were in or out; for the rest a brute-force search could be done...
12. 12.▲
    by bernardwilson 16y ago

    How Ironic indeed. Oracle insist that the hosting must be on java.net. Sonatype state that it's 'standard practice' to host on a 'blessed' repository. Short memories indeed.