bennettpompi1

6 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by bennettpompi1 8d ago

   this is hilarious lmao
2. 2.▲
   by bennettpompi1 1mo ago

   I absolutely, 100% think that we should attempt to stigmatize the use of LLMs as a junk-food substitute for engaging with real, human writing, yeah. I just don't / cannot bring myself to accept the "let people enjoy things&qu
3. 3.▲
   by bennettpompi1 1mo ago

   I just fundamentally disagree with this. On one hand, sure, you can argue that there is no direct harm caused by using LLMs to generate fiction for personal consumption. But on the other hand, I feel like there is a deep spiritual deadening
4. 4.▲
   by bennettpompi1 1mo ago

   This sucks. Sorry. If you can't write on your own, don't write at all. Extremely disappointed that anyone is giving this votes.
5. 5.▲
   by bennettpompi1 2mo ago

   I may be missing something, but your example doesn't typecheck? class Animal { } class Dog extends Animal{ bark(){return 1} } class Cat extends Animal{ bark(){return 1} } const dogs: Dog[] = [] const animals: An
6. 6.▲
   by bennettpompi1 4mo ago

   fun project!
7. 7.▲
   by bennettpompi1 6mo ago

   this is cool! i'd recommend fleshing out the README. Clicked on the link before the discussion and was a tad confused.
8. 8.▲
   by bennettpompi1 7mo ago

   I really enjoyed reading this article however I can't help but feeling that if you need anything described within it probably shouldn't be writing JS in the first place