Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
benilov
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
1.
▲
by
benilov
9y ago
It's possible to start agile projects without requirements but with loads of user research and prototyping instead.
2.
▲
Open sourcing Fastly-configure, a script for automating Fastly config
(gdstechnology.blog.gov.uk)
1 points
by
benilov
11y ago
|
0 comments
3.
▲
The Web Only Sucks If You Are a Sucker
(medium.com)
4 points
by
benilov
11y ago
|
0 comments
4.
▲
by
benilov
12y ago
DbFit ( http://dbfit.github.io/dbfit/ ) provides a more heavy-weight, but much more scalable alternative to raw SQL for testing CTEs.
5.
▲
Migrating GOV.UK to new infrastructure
(gdstechnology.blog.gov.uk)
4 points
by
benilov
12y ago
|
0 comments
6.
▲
A tool to ensure you get the correct (semantic) version for your project
(tombye.github.io)
1 points
by
benilov
13y ago
|
0 comments
7.
▲
How the Government Digital Service uses git and github
(gdstechnology.blog.gov.uk)
1 points
by
benilov
13y ago
|
0 comments
8.
▲
Performance Testing of the Go GOV.UK router with Go
(gdstechnology.blog.gov.uk)
4 points
by
benilov
13y ago
|
0 comments
9.
▲
Choosing Go to implement the new GOV.UK router
(gdstechnology.blog.gov.uk)
75 points
by
benilov
13y ago
|
96 comments
10.
▲
by
benilov
13y ago
There is monopolistic/market manipulating behaviour going on - it's basically an oligopoly, and the barrier to entry into the mobile telecoms market (ie building your network) is only growing.
11.
▲
by
benilov
13y ago
The UK is adopting a similar approach: http://digital.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/2013/01/17/identity-beyo...
12.
▲
by
benilov
13y ago
Well ok, the GOV.UK is the 80+% solution for publishing; transactions is another matter, although hopefully when the Digital by Default Service Standard starts kicking in (specifically the open source provision: https://www.gov.u
13.
▲
by
benilov
13y ago
Well, the GOV.UK code ( https://www.github.com/alphagov ) is your 80% (or more likely higher) solution. It's based around many micro-services that integrate over HTTP, so it's extremely extensible. However, even wit
14.
▲
by
benilov
13y ago
Grassroots sounds nice, but the hard work isn't writing the code - it's convincing those within government that user-centered services and open source are the way to go. I believe that this can only be achieved given a strong mand
15.
▲
Useful GitHub patterns
(blog.quickpeople.co.uk)
141 points
by
benilov
13y ago
|
19 comments
16.
▲
7 types of feedback that helped make GOV.UK awesome
(quickpeople.wordpress.com)
2 points
by
benilov
13y ago
|
0 comments
17.
▲
The UK government pays me to write open source all day
(quickpeople.wordpress.com)
6 points
by
benilov
13y ago
|
0 comments
18.
▲
by
benilov
13y ago
What's a 'tittle'?
19.
▲
by
benilov
13y ago
> Holding someone else to your own arbitrary standards of acceptability is exactly what I'm referring to when I say these sort of complaints usually ignore the possibility that someone else's life is different than one's own. I agree wi
20.
▲
by
benilov
13y ago
> I even considered not submitting this comment, for fear of anyone misunderstanding or taking this the wrong way, and the inevitable "open source is a responsibility" responses. I'm glad that you did, thank you for taking the time to r
21.
▲
by
benilov
13y ago
I've taken over the maintenance for a project a few months ago and have tried to stick as closely as I can to what I wrote about. I've also used the pull request hack, it's a really good idea!
22.
▲
by
benilov
13y ago
I definitely didn't want to imply that "you should merge any ol' crap". I was commenting more on how maintainers communicate (or don't communicate) their feedback. I see no problem with saying "please add tests", or "don't break the existin
23.
▲
A plea for better open source etiquette
(quickpeople.wordpress.com)
103 points
by
benilov
13y ago
|
51 comments
24.
▲
Search rankings with Google Spreadsheets
(digital.cabinetoffice.gov.uk)
2 points
by
benilov
13y ago
|
0 comments