beeboobaa3

9 ms·

1.
by beeboobaa3 2y ago
[flagged]
2.
by beeboobaa3 2y ago
sure but politely demanding some documents is not the same as raiding an office
3.
by beeboobaa3 2y ago
A guess that's probably correct: Many torrent sites (where the client can download .torrent files from when given an URL) their infra sucks. This includes expired certificates. Users don't want to deal with that shit. Developers d
4.
by beeboobaa3 2y ago
Let me guess, you're in the US along one of the hardcoded routes?
5.
by beeboobaa3 2y ago
It can, for plugins. GP is talking about extensions which you typically don't need.
6.
by beeboobaa3 2y ago
I'm using several maven plugins (not extensions) that are defined within the reactor project itself. It works well. You do need to split your build into multiple projects governed by a reactor but you'll have that anyway as soon a
7.
by beeboobaa3 2y ago
My problem with gradle is that its configuration language is a programming language. Sounds amazing in practice. And it is. Until you need to fix a 3 year old build that has some insane wizardry going on.
8.
by beeboobaa3 2y ago
What? I never said being computer illiterate is bad. Plenty of fine people are computer illiterate. And plenty of fine people are fantastic at things I'll never be good at. That's fine.
9.
by beeboobaa3 2y ago
It allows it's users to actually use their computer as a computer instead of a glorified phone. MacOS nannies you left and right, preventing you from doing things you want to do because Apple says no. Windows historically didn't h
10.
by beeboobaa3 2y ago
I mean in total it's like 10-30 lines of code put in the place where you load the user session, and a very small rearchitecture of the database. So... Kind of, yeah.
11.
by beeboobaa3 2y ago
Each user gets a token associated with them. On each request you first check if they are authenticated via your auth of choice. If so, you take the token associated with this auth from your database. If not, you take the token sent via cook
12.
by beeboobaa3 2y ago
It would be a good first step for you stop being sneaky about this. Very hard to respect you as a moderator when you employ underhanded tactics like sneakily rate limiting accounts and trying to gaslight people into thinking this is an univ
13.
by beeboobaa3 2y ago
> Haven't heard of this happening with later models. Baseband sourcecode firmware is really rare. You know what they say. "If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear" So I wonder what they're trying to hide
14.
by beeboobaa3 2y ago
The triggering of the limit is automatic, but being subjected to the limit is something the moderators can turn on per account. If I make a new account it'll be free of the limit until dang gets upset again.
15.
by beeboobaa3 2y ago
After you've written your comment and when you click reply you get the message: > You're posting too fast. Please slow down. Thanks.
16.
by beeboobaa3 2y ago
> (snarky response) This is what we call "Put up or shut up". It's easy to bash someone for not wanting to spend many hours of their time to work they have no interest in, just because some third party is now demanding it.
17.
by beeboobaa3 2y ago
how are you going to authenticate the user? now you need to solve that if you didn't have a web login before. --- Guess @dang decided to rate limit my account again so I can't post replies :-) > Some token that every account ge
18.
by beeboobaa3 2y ago
The point is you can't use the regular filesystem syscalls on android, it has to go through a weird java layer
19.
by beeboobaa3 2y ago
Since you have such strong opinions on the matter, and experience, why don't you contribute to the SyncThing android app and implement this? Alternatively you could grab your time machine, travel back several years and let them know to
20.
by beeboobaa3 2y ago
it's how the cross platform software works and has always worked. demanding a total rewrite just to publish on a single channel is insane, especially since this used to be the ONLY way to do things. google could always contribute to th
21.
by beeboobaa3 2y ago
It depends on how you're publishing your apps. If you have a registered business which publishes the app then you can use the business address, so a PO box might be viable. You'll need to make sure your business is registered on t
22.
by beeboobaa3 2y ago
Not allowed.
23.
by beeboobaa3 2y ago
> Technology should develop towards simplifying humanity’s life, not making it more complicated I agree with this statement for normal people . Not for software developers. You're just begging for stagnation. Your job is literally
24.
by beeboobaa3 2y ago
The problem is that my coworkers are morons who seem incapable of remembering to run a simple `explain analyze` on their queries. They'd rather just write monstrosities that kindasorta work without giving a single damn about performanc
25.
by beeboobaa3 2y ago
This has been solved by logical replication a few versions ago. 1. Leave your old database running 2. Start your new database with new version 3. Run logical replication and let it catch up 4. Decide you want to switch over. 5. Using a scri
26.
by beeboobaa3 2y ago
It just opens/closes the file/edit/view menu.
27.
by beeboobaa3 2y ago
So is a million years. Not how it works.
28.
by beeboobaa3 2y ago
nsa is storing everything
29.
by beeboobaa3 2y ago
No, that doesn't count. Companies have tried arguing that their ads' tracking cookies are strictly necessary otherwise they wouldn't be able to offer their services (ads pay the bills). And yet, they require consent. Preventi
30.
by beeboobaa3 2y ago
It's clearly a tracking cookie. > for a limited persistent duration FTA: > However, the VGUI browser had no issues saving cookies with expiry dates exceeding 10+ years! So no, it doesn't even qualify.

More ›