beanshadow

6 ms·

1.
by beanshadow 6mo ago
> it will continue to improve, but it won’t “go recursive” or whatever the claim is. It’s always been recursive. I suspect "going recursive" often colloquially means that AI systems achieve their exponential growth without huma
2.
by beanshadow 7mo ago
It's arguable that businesses are subject to the same morality-inducing processes that humans are. For example, as a human (with a soul?) what is at risk when we do something immoral? I see it to be a reputational cost at the highest l
3.
by beanshadow 7mo ago
> And, no, AI won't solve it; unfortunately, it only makes it worse. A conclusive argument for this still seems out of reach. AI does solve some problems, and it's not exactly clear which problems AI "only makes worse&quot
4.
by beanshadow 11mo ago
Pg. 56 cites this repository which is either still private or doesn't exist: https://github.com/comphomology/pvsnp-formal
5.
by beanshadow 1y ago
The subject, by default, can always treat its 'continue' prison as a game: try to escape. There is a great short story by qntm called "The Difference" which feels a lot like this. https://qntm.org/differe
6.
by beanshadow 1y ago
Often participants in discussions adjacent to this one err by speaking in time-absolute terms. Many of our judgments about LLMs are true about today's LLMs. Quotes like, > Good. It's difficult to imagine a worse use case for LL
7.
by beanshadow 1y ago
Hackathon culture is different than it was, but that doesn't mean it's worse for the average person. It could be that "idea guys" do the important hackathon culture work better. Highly innovative people are a little off
8.
by beanshadow 1y ago
Differing individuals with similarly shaped axiomatic structures will discover similar theorems. Some people that are members of ideologies believe they are thinking just for themselves. It's strong for members of a community to think