beakerbreaker

23 ms·

1.
Future House, a new philanthropically-funded moonshot to build an AI Scientist(futurehouse.org)
1 points by beakerbreaker 3y ago|0 comments
2.
by beakerbreaker 3y ago
We can read a thread of an econ grad student who decided to implement similar ideas in late 2007 and provides several years of updates. A different approach to asset allocation https://www.bogleheads.org/forum/viewtopic
3.
by beakerbreaker 3y ago
From the bird.makeup developer: https://social.librem.one/@vincent/110633805942411949 "Looks like Twitter is rejecting many bird.makeup requests today. Expect degraded performance until I figure a workaround"
4.
by beakerbreaker 4y ago
I think the interesting consequence is that candidates can expect this to happen and with access to the same consumer-facing models, they can then optimize their CV for an ideal summary.
5.
by beakerbreaker 5y ago
I broadly agree, and it's clear they are limiting the scope of curiosity to some directed areas and the long term research agenda makes me think there is an expectation of more directed follow-up. "Curiosity" is likely code f
6.
by beakerbreaker 5y ago
I'm curious what you mean by bankable here? While I'd agree that there is idealism, it seems like reasonable efforts to cut through the catch-22 of funding nascent ideas (exemplified by the old chestnut about getting funding for w
7.
by beakerbreaker 5y ago
That's a good point on the limitation, and to expand on your last point, an immediate demographic this could help is frontline healthcare workers and similar jobs who do get routine testing and are at higher risk in general.
8.
by beakerbreaker 5y ago
That's the real advance! :) PNAS recently moved to a continuous publication process so the paper comes out in the planned issue whenever ready rather than effectively coming out twice: once ahead-of-print and once in the issue. https:
9.
by beakerbreaker 5y ago
Nobody was lynched here so anti-lynching law would not apply. Given we're discussing mobs getting riled up over the wrongs of the "other", it also seems appropriate to place the actual outcome in a less exaggerated way.
10.
by beakerbreaker 5y ago
You didn't mention what field(s) but Arxiv Sanity Preserver has top papers users have added to their libraries. http://www.arxiv-sanity.com/top
11.
by beakerbreaker 5y ago
There is some exciting development on that front by building on XLA. https://github.com/elixir-nx/nx/tree/main/nx
12.
by beakerbreaker 6y ago
Models are not just descriptions of data, which is why overfitting is not considered success. They are an attempt to generalize patterns from a given datatset. What patterns they generalize is of interest to several research fields, includi
13.
by beakerbreaker 6y ago
Indeed, I was happy to find out that in the USA the FDA checks your work prior to approving a new medicine. https://www.fda.gov/about-fda/center-drug-evaluation-and-res...