beaglessss

6 ms·

1.
by beaglessss 2y ago
Something like half of adults in Israeli controlled territory are disenfranchised. They're hardly a democracy imo.
2.
by beaglessss 2y ago
A guy kidnapped in Iraq was jailed on return for back child support because he couldn't send the checks. It's in the best interest of the child. https://greensboro.com/ex-hostage-jailed-in-child-support-ca...
3.
by beaglessss 2y ago
Would make sense imo to auction them to the highest bidder and distribute it to the heirs. Or give the heirs shares of a corporation that holds the artifact. I'm not sure about Indonesia government but I'm confident if my forefat
4.
by beaglessss 2y ago
The concern here seems to be longshoreman is one of the highest paid blue collar jobs; there is close to zero percent chance the middle age and older guys get anything like this again. It's quite dissimilar to something like a unskill
5.
by beaglessss 2y ago
The reason you can move across the nation for a good wage is in part that jobs were shit canned when they become economically or technologically disadvantaged to more efficient alternatives. Your high wage was made possible due to firing l
6.
by beaglessss 2y ago
I imagine they usually don't know. Some fraction of identities are real IDs taken advantage of by sanctioned entities. If you bank at all you knowingly accept some level of sanctioned entities, but often don't know what identity
7.
by beaglessss 2y ago
Are you at least open to the idea that the major reason why many other nations like Bahamas, Cayman Islands, Panama, St Kitts came off the black list and into AML and KYC compliance is so they would have low friction wire transfers and bank
8.
by beaglessss 2y ago
One example is criminal pays a heroin addict for their real ID and then basically uses them as pass through nominee on the account.
9.
by beaglessss 2y ago
No I haven't. For instance the nation of Myanmar is in the list. OFAC as far as I know would permit transmission to most people there The black list is nominally about weak AML and other factors. It's an example I used because
10.
by beaglessss 2y ago
Yes if you cutoff the first word it becomes untrue, how ridiculously disinguine. Here's an exercise, look at the FATF black list and then start asking your bank about the process for wiring large sums there. A lot of this compliance i
11.
by beaglessss 2y ago
My response is civil rights should drive the tax man's behavior and not the other way around. I will accept a loss in efficiency of taxation.
12.
by beaglessss 2y ago
The customer isnt charged, it is the bank/entity or persons there. Not legal advice but failure if AML and not collecting identifying information is charged under 31 USC 5322 under indictment I'm reading. The law here notes even
13.
by beaglessss 2y ago
Banks are always doing business with criminals and sanctioned entities and they know that, although not always when and where. The difference is if the bank does KYC and the criminal uses a dark identity, the bank will likely get away with
14.
by beaglessss 2y ago
Your counterparty was almost certainly KYCd if the receiving bank deals in USD or receive from a bank in us jurisdiction.
15.
by beaglessss 2y ago
Every single bank and person conceals illegal activity by your final sentence. You probably have sold something for cash bought by a drug dealer and unknowingly laundered drug money. The point here is that an unwitting actor is somehow gui
16.
by beaglessss 2y ago
Unless someone dislikes them, in which case they will unwittingly accept a sanctioned entity and then the indictment will scream bloody murder that this was basically all about not doing KYC (even though we all know sanctioned entities oper
17.
by beaglessss 2y ago
In criminal law people aren't expected to prove what they did wasn't illegal, it is the other way around. What did happen in the case of CZs conviction is the state alleged that lack of KYC allows some actors with illegal funds t
18.
by beaglessss 2y ago
I suspect a lot of people would be eager to know the names of these banks that let customers operate without KYC for awhile.
19.
by beaglessss 2y ago
Almost all large financial transactions or storage useful and active in commerce require KYC or reporting so the magic is the very act of privacy makes it illegal.
20.
by beaglessss 2y ago
There is still an element of truth. If you don't provide KYC for a bank account there is now a crime if it is knowingly allowed. You could go offshore but now you need to report the account. You could form an anonymous LLC but law r
21.
by beaglessss 2y ago
While AML regulations likely have an impact, imo their main secret motive is financial surveillance.
22.
by beaglessss 2y ago
You could still buy it from a guy with a 40 gallon drum on a flatbed though. Cash only of course.
23.
by beaglessss 2y ago
Legalizing floating market exchange rates.